ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
239
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Benchmarks X Joint Committee X Corporate Disclosure X Market Integrity X Innovation and Products X Compliance table X Opinion X Reference X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
08/04/2022 ESMA81-459-57 Working group on euro risk-free rates- 2 March 2022 minutes Reference PDF
969.61 KB
18/07/2022 ESMA81-459-65 Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates- 17 June 2022 Meeting Minutes Reference PDF
3.32 MB
24/10/2022 ESMA81-459-72 Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates- 15 September 2022 Meeting Minutes Reference PDF
2.07 MB
02/03/2022 ESMA81-459-50 Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates – Work Programme for 2022/23 Reference PDF
186.08 KB
25/08/2014 JC/2014/43 lt Vertybinių popierių (ESMA) ir bankų (EBI) sektorių skundų nagrinėjimo gairės , Reference PDF
153.6 KB

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) published today their Joint Committee final Report on guidelines for handling consumer complaints in the securities and banking sectors. The document aims to increase market confidence and for the benefit of consumers and firms alike it will ensure a harmonised approach to handling complaints for all 28 EU Member States and across all financial services sectors.The final report published today is part of the efforts of the European Supervisory Authorities to bring further supervisory convergence across the securities and banking sectors. It was developed on the basis of the existing complaints-handling guidelines established by EIOPA (the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) for the insurance sector. The report was launched for a public consultation last year and this final version takes into consideration the feedback received.ESMA and the EBA consider that these guidelines will ensure a consistent approach to complaints-handling across the EU. Consumers can purchase financial services and products in the investment, banking and insurance sectors across the entire EU Single Market and these guidelines will allow them to refer to a single set of complaints-handling arrangements. EU consumers will therefore be able to rely on the same approach irrespective of what type of product they have purchased and where they have purchased it.In addition to strengthening consumer protection -a key statutory objective for ESMA and for the EBA-, the guidelines will also allow firms, some of which sell products from more than one sector across the EU, to streamline and standardise their own complaints-handling arrangements. National regulators too will be able to supervise the same harmonised requirements across all sectors of financial services in their own jurisdictions.The guidelines will be translated into the official languages of the European Union (EU) and they will become applicable two months after the date of publication of their translations.

25/03/2022 JC 2022 12 Updated supervisory statement on the application of the SFDR , Reference PDF
231.45 KB
06/12/2022 ESMA70-145-1397 TRs IC_templates , Reference XLSX
31.25 KB
04/04/2016 2016/222 ToR MISC Reference PDF
130.02 KB
04/04/2016 2016/220 ToR FISC Reference PDF
90.34 KB
07/04/2020 ESMA50-157-2140 ToR FISC Reference PDF
97.63 KB
11/02/2016 2016/215 ToR CRSC Reference PDF
131.23 KB
06/11/2017 ESMA50-165-422 The impact of charges on mutual fund returns- correction , , Reference PDF
590.09 KB

ERRATUM - In the original version of this document published on 19 October 2017 in table V.3 on page 4, the values in the last four rows of column five were accidentally misreported. For this reason, ESMA now provides a corrected version, including the corrected values and a footnote pointing to the initial mistake.

ESMA carried out a first analysis on fund performance measures, developing initial metrics to analyse the impact of ongoing fees, one-off charges and inflation on the returns of mutual funds. Key preliminary results for the EU fund industry show: Substantial reduction in net returns available to investors, especially in the retail sector and weakly cost- or price-sensitive investment decisions by retail investors

On average ongoing fees and one-off charges and inflation-reduced returns available to investors by 29% of gross returns between 2013 and 2015. These reductions apply to all market segments, while varying across jurisdictions, asset classes and client types. Relative return reductions range from 11% for passive equity fund shares to 44% for retail fund shares in bond mutual funds. Relative and absolute return reductions for actively managed and retail fund shares tend to exceed those of passively managed and institutional fund shares. Despite the impact of fees and charges on the net outcome to investors, these do not seem to be reflected in investor choices.

10/02/2022 ESMA 80-195-1352 Text mining ESG disclosures in rating agency press releases , , Reference PDF
403.58 KB
27/10/2017 ESMA32-63-364 Summary of results of the fact finding exercise on IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 , Reference PDF
292.46 KB
27/03/2014 2014/332 Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements , Opinion PDF
203.1 KB
Legal basis 1.    Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation)  sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”.  2.    In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level.  3.    This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)  and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs.  4.    ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5.    In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6.    In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7.    As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8.    ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9.    ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10.    Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11.    The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products.
25/08/2021 Joint Committee Statement on variation margin exchange under the EMIR RTS on OTC derivatives Reference PDF
191 KB
22/10/2015 2015/1597 Standard form for major holdings , Reference DOCX
350.81 KB
22/10/2015 2015/1596 Standard form for disclosure of Home Member State , Reference DOCX
344.53 KB
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroslsksv
28/07/2022 C 2022 1931 SFDR Templates , Reference ZIP
1.44 MB
29/11/2017 ECB/ESMA/FSMA Risk Free Rate Working Group Application Form Reference DOCX
25.87 KB

Pages