ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Investor Protection filter MiFID - Investor Protection
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- CESR Archive (287) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (71) Apply Post Trading filter
- Joint Committee (39) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Fund Management (32) Apply Fund Management filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (32) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (31) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Supervisory convergence (31) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Corporate Disclosure (30) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (27) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Market Abuse (19) Apply Market Abuse filter
- CCP Directorate (18) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (14) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (12) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market data (10) Apply Market data filter
- Market Integrity (9) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (8) Apply Short Selling filter
- Sustainable finance (8) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Innovation and Products (7) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securitisation (7) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Trading (6) Apply Trading filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- European Single Electronic Format (4) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Corporate Information (3) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (2) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Press Releases (2) Apply Press Releases filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Reference (94) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (87) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (65) Apply Opinion filter
- Press Release (60) Apply Press Release filter
- Consultation Paper (58) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Statement (40) Apply Statement filter
- Letter (29) Apply Letter filter
- Investor Warning (27) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Speech (26) Apply Speech filter
- Report (22) Apply Report filter
- Decision (21) Apply Decision filter
- Compliance table (14) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Standards (4) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (3) Apply Annual Report filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (2) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28/03/2011 | 2011/22 | Report- ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- July 2010 to December 2010 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 134.79 KB |
||||
04/10/2011 | 2011/323 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 797.56 KB |
||||
01/03/2012 | 2012/137 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.32 MB |
ESMA publishes today the second part of its final advice (ESMA/2012/137) on possible delegated acts for the Prospectus Directive (PD). The advice was submitted to the Commission on 29 February 2012. In its advice, ESMA proposes how to use a prospectus in a retail cascade and provides input on how to review the provisions of the Prospectus Regulation concerning tax information, indices, auditor’s report on profit forecasts and estimates and audited historical financial information. Today’s advice follows a public consultation started on 13 December 2011. Overall, the technical advice aims to achieve a high level of investor protection and to increase across Europe the legal clarity and efficiency of the prospectus regime. Investment prospectuses as such are aimed to provide investors with easily accessible information on financial products so as to foster in-formed decision-making. | |||
22/06/2012 | 2012/382 | MiFID Q&A in the area of investor protection and intermediaries | MiFID - Investor Protection | Q&A | PDF 319.78 KB |
||||
06/07/2012 | 2012/387 | Final report Guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 444.15 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/602 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2011 to December 2011 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 573.49 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/603 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2012 to June 2012 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 431.12 KB |
NOTE: This Report is an amended version of the Report published on 25 September 2012. The previously published Report was amended on 15 May 2013 following the discovery of factual errors in the statis-tical information in Section III.2. Title ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported - January 2012 to June 2012 | |||
09/01/2013 | 2012/864 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
10/06/2013 | 2013/619 | Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 596.91 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive. This is the first report of its kind and provides a comparison of liability regimes covering the EEA – comprising the 27 EU Member States along with Iceland and Norway and is aimed at providing clarity for market participants about the different regimes in place. The report contains an overview of the different arrangements and frameworks in place in EEA States to address administrative, criminal, civil and governmental liability, and provides clarity to market participants about the different regimes in place. The report was compiled in response to a European Commission request of January 2011 for assistance in identifying and monitoring the different regimes in EEA states. The report does not cover how the regimes, or sanctions, are applied. Report Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Annex III Individual responses from EEA States | |||
14/06/2013 | 2013/741 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported—January 2012 to December 2012 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 457.11 KB |
The report compiles statistical data regarding the number of prospectuses approved and passported by National Competent Authorities in the period from January 2012 to December 2012 (with a quarterly disclosure). | |||
18/12/2013 | 2013/1943 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported—January 2013 to June 2013 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 338.17 KB |
||||
01/04/2014 | 2014/342 | Languages accepted for the purpose of the scrutiny of the Prospectus and requirements of translation of the Summary- March 2014 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 194.98 KB |
The document provides an overview of the languages that each national competent authority accepts when acting as home or host competent authority, as the case may be, for the purpose of the scrutiny of the prospectus. In addition the document outlines national requirements in relation to translation of summaries. | |||
23/10/2014 | 2014/1276 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported – January 2013 to December 2013 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 285.12 KB |
The report compiles statistical data regarding the number of prospectuses approved and passported by National Competent Authorities in the period from January 2013 to December 2013 (with a quarterly disclosure). | |||
23/10/2014 | 2014/1277 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported – January 2014 to June 2014 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 211.96 KB |
The report compiles statistical data regarding the number of prospectuses approved and passported by National Competent Authorities in the period from January 2014 to June 2014 (with a quarterly disclosure). | |||
19/12/2014 | 2014/1569 | Technical Advice to the Commission on MiFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Advice | PDF 2.8 MB |
Reasons for publication The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) received a formal request (mandate) from the European Commission (Commission) on 23 April 2014 to provide technical advice to assist the Commission on the possible content of the delegated acts required by several provisions of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). The mandate focuses on technical issues which follow from MiFID II and MiFIR and is available on the European Commission website (here). ESMA was required to provide technical advice by no later than six months after the entry into force of MiFID II and MiFIR (2 July 2014). Contents This final report follows the same structure as the Consultation Paper (CP) published by ESMA on 22 May 2014 which is: (1) Introduction, (2) Investor protection, (3) Transparency, (4) Data publication, (5) Micro-structural issues, (6) Requirements applying on and to trading venues, (7) Commodity derivatives and (8) Portfolio compression. This paper also contains summaries of responses to the CP received by ESMA. The rationale of those items covered already in the CP for which no relevant changes have been introduced, is not developed again in this Final Report. ESMA recommends, therefore, to read this report together with the CP published on 22 May 2014 to have a complete vision of the rationale for ESMA’s technical advice. Next steps Delegated acts should be adopted by the Commission so that they enter into application by 30 months following the entry into force of the Directive and Regulation, taking into account the right of the European Parliament and Council to object to a delegated act within 3 months (which can be extended by a further 3 months). | |||
25/02/2015 | 2015/494 | Best Execution under MiFID | MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 761.62 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain. | |||
23/07/2015 | 2015/1136 | EEA prospectus activity in 2014 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 578.07 KB |
||||
30/11/2015 | 2015/1783 | Final Report on complex debt instruments and structured deposits | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 409.89 KB |
||||
17/12/2015 | 2015/1886 | Final report on guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 422.68 KB |
Reasons for publication 1. Article 25(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) states that Member States shall require investment firms to ensure and demonstrate to competent authorities on request that natural persons giving investment advice or providing information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on behalf of the investment firm possess the necessary knowledge and competence to fulfil their obligations under Article 24 and Article 25 . 2. The European Securities and Markets Authority is required by Article 25(9) of MiFID II to develop – by 3 January 2016 - guidelines specifying criteria for the assessment of knowledge and competence of investment firms’ personnel. The guidelines will come into effect on 3 January 2017. 3. In accordance with Article 16(2) of the ESMA Regulation, a consultation was launched on 23 April 2015. The Consultation Paper (CP) set out draft ESMA guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence of individuals in investment firms providing investment advice or information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on behalf of the investment firm. The consultation period closed on 10 July 2015. 4. ESMA received 80 responses. The answers received on the CP are available on ESMA’s website unless respondents requested otherwise. 5. As provided by Article 16 of the ESMA Regulation, ESMA also sought the advice of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group’s (SMSG). 6. This paper contains summaries of responses received and feedback statements provided by ESMA. ESMA recommends that this report should be read together with the CP published on 23 April 2015 to have a complete understanding of the rationale for the guidelines. The final guidelines presented in Annex VI take into account the comments and suggestions raised by respondents. Contents 7. Section II briefly summarises the feedback to the CP and the main responses from ESMA. 8. Section III contains the Annexes: Annex I provides the Summary of questions, Annex II contains the legislative mandate, Annex III reports the cost-benefit analysis, Annex IV reports the Opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group, Annex V details the feedback on the CP, Annex VI sets out the final text of the guidelines and Annex VII describes some illustrative examples of the application of certain aspects of the guidelines. Next Steps 9. The final guidelines in Annex VI will be translated into the official EU languages and published on the ESMA website. The publication of the translations will trigger a two-month period during which National Competent Authorities (NCAs) must notify ESMA whether they comply or intend to comply with the guidelines. |
|||
22/12/2015 | 2015/1861 | Final report- Guidelines on cross-selling practices | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 389.42 KB |