ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove Guidelines and Technical standards filter Guidelines and Technical standards
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Brexit filter Brexit
- CESR Archive (286) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (55) Apply Post Trading filter
- Joint Committee (37) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (32) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Corporate Disclosure (27) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Fund Management (26) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (25) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (25) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (21) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- CCP Directorate (18) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Market Abuse (18) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Prospectus (17) Apply Prospectus filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (14) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Market data (10) Apply Market data filter
- Benchmarks (8) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Sustainable finance (8) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Securitisation (6) Apply Securitisation filter
- Short Selling (6) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Trading (6) Apply Trading filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- European Single Electronic Format (4) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Corporate Information (3) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (2) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Press Releases (2) Apply Press Releases filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Guidelines & Recommendations (562) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (42) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (42) Apply Reference filter
- Compliance table (40) Apply Compliance table filter
- Statement (39) Apply Statement filter
- Report (20) Apply Report filter
- Speech (15) Apply Speech filter
- Consultation Paper (12) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Letter (4) Apply Letter filter
- Opinion (4) Apply Opinion filter
- Annual Report (1) Apply Annual Report filter
- Decision (1) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Advice (1) Apply Technical Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/07/2011 | 2011/194 | Report- Mapping of the Transparency Directive | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.15 MB |
Report - Mapping of the Transparency Directive | |||
18/01/2011 | 2011/26 | Summary Report on the mapping of contingency measures | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 93.63 KB |
||||
26/04/2012 | 2012/270 | Actual use of sanctioning powers under MAD | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.55 MB |
The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010. The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime. | |||
24/05/2012 | 2012/300 | Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 467.38 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published today “Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process“, a peer review report on the application of regulatory good practices by national supervisory authorities - competent authorities (CA) when approving investment prospectuses.The review was conducted using good practice criteria that ESMA developed on selected areas of the Prospectus Directive dealing with the approval process for investment prospectuses. The prospectuses provide investors with easy to understand and relevant information on investment products. Peer review reports on national regulators’ procedures contribute to ESMA’s objective of fostering supervisory convergence and achieving a level playing field between jurisdictions. | |||
06/07/2012 | 2012/387 | Final report Guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 444.15 KB |
||||
01/07/2013 | 2013/805 | Supervisory Practices under MAD- Peer review report and Good Practices | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.17 MB |
ESMA's peer review of the supervisory practices EEA national competent authorities (NCAs) covers how national authorities enforce the requirements of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD). The Directive deals with the prevention of the dissemination of misleading information, the breach of reporting obligations and market abuse. | |||
01/07/2013 | 2013/806 | Supervisory Practices under MAD- Mapping Report | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 315.44 KB |
ESMA's Mapping Report on Supervisory Practices under MAD sets out the situation in each Member State as regards their implementation of the various requirements of the Market Abuse Directive. | |||
11/12/2014 | 2014/1485 | MiFID – Conduct of Business, fair, clear and not misleading information | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 614.16 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review of how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise MiFID conduct of business rules on providing fair, clear and not misleading information to clients. The peer review focused on NCAs’ organisation, supervisory approaches, monitoring and complaints handling in relation to information and marketing communications under MiFID. The Report found that there was overall a high degree of compliance amongst NCAs with the good practices identified in these key areas. However, a variety of approaches were observed, leading to different intensity of supervision. A number of areas for improvement were identified. They include: • enhanced use of on-site inspections and thematic reviews; • a specific focus on conduct of business issues in firms’ risk assessments; and • greater efforts to detect failings by firms in a timely manner. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by NCAs in a self-assessment questionnaire and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. | |||
22/12/2015 | 2015/1905 | MAD Supervisory Practices peer review follow-up | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 239.64 KB |
||||
25/02/2015 | 2015/494 | Best Execution under MiFID | MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 761.62 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain. | |||
18/03/2015 | 2015/592 | Automated Trading Guidelines- ESMA peer review among National Competent Authorities | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 930.33 KB |
||||
30/06/2016 | 2016/1055 | Peer Review Report on Prospectus Approval Process | Prospectus, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
30/09/2016 | 2016/1412 | Final Report on MAR Guidelines on commodity derivatives | Guidelines and Technical standards, Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Final Report | PDF 566.52 KB |
Article 7(5) of MAR provides that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) shall issue guidelines to establish a non-exhaustive indicative list of information which is reasonably expected or is required to be disclosed in accordance with legal or regulatory provisions in Union or national law, market rules, contract, practice or custom, on the relevant commodity derivatives markets or spot markets as referred to in Article 7(1)(b) of MAR. This final report follows the Consultation Paper (CP) issued on March 2016. Contents Section 2 contains information on the background and mandate, while Section 3 sets out ESMA’s feedback to the CP responses in relation to the scope of the guidelines, the financial instruments and products covered by the examples of information relating directly and indirectly to commodity derivatives and information directly relating to a spot market contract. It also indicates whether and where ESMA has changed the guidelines following the consultation. Annex I lists questions raised in the CP. Annex 2 provides the legislative mandate on the basis of which ESMA is issuing these guidelines. Annex 3 sets out ESMA’s view on the costs and benefits associated with these guidelines. Annex 4 contains the text of the guidelines. Next steps The guidelines in Annex 4 will be translated into the official languages of the European Union and published on the ESMA’s website. Within 2 months of the issuance of the translations, each national competent authority will have to confirm whether it complies or intends to comply with those guidelines. In the event that a national competent authority does not comply or does not intend to comply, it will have to inform ESMA, stating its reasons. ESMA will publish the fact that a national competent authority does not comply or does not intend to comply with those guidelines.
|
|||
10/10/2016 | 2016/1451 | Final Report- Guidelines on transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronisation under MiFID II | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Final Report | PDF 388.3 KB |
||||
07/04/2016 | 2016/584 | Suitability Peer Review- Final Report | MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 459.35 KB |
||||
07/04/2016 | 2016/585 | Suitability Peer Review- Annex | MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 987.81 KB |
||||
26/05/2016 | 2016/725 | Draft RTS on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR | Guidelines and Technical standards, Post Trading, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Final Report | PDF 740.71 KB |
||||
15/04/2013 | ESMA/2013/476 | Peer Review–Money Market Fund Guidelines | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 763.46 KB |
||||
11/04/2019 | ESMA31-62-780 | Q&A on Prospectus Related Topics | Brexit, Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Finance, Corporate Governance, Corporate Information, Prospectus, Supervisory convergence | Q&A | PDF 957.9 KB |
||||
09/11/2020 | ESMA31-67-127 | Question and answers on Transparency Directive (TD) | Brexit, Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Finance, Supervisory convergence, Transparency | Q&A | PDF 352.79 KB |