ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- CESR Archive (415) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Speeches (159) Apply Speeches filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (126) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (98) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Fund Management (58) Apply Fund Management filter
- Market Integrity (45) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Joint Committee (42) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Short Selling (41) Apply Short Selling filter
- Corporate Disclosure (37) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (37) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Supervisory convergence (36) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Market Abuse (27) Apply Market Abuse filter
- CCP Directorate (23) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Prospectus (23) Apply Prospectus filter
- Benchmarks (17) Apply Benchmarks filter
- COVID-19 (17) Apply COVID-19 filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (17) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Corporate Information (15) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Sustainable finance (14) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Brexit (12) Apply Brexit filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (11) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market data (11) Apply Market data filter
- Securitisation (11) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trading (9) Apply Trading filter
- Board of Supervisors (7) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- European Single Electronic Format (5) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- International cooperation (2) Apply International cooperation filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (2) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Press Releases (2) Apply Press Releases filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (2) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Speech filter Speech
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- Reference (178) Apply Reference filter
- Consultation Paper (93) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Press Release (93) Apply Press Release filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (58) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Statement (58) Apply Statement filter
- Letter (51) Apply Letter filter
- Report (49) Apply Report filter
- Decision (23) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Standards (15) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Q&A (10) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (9) Apply Compliance table filter
- Annual Report (6) Apply Annual Report filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/06/2010 | 10-333 | Technical Advice- The Equivalence between the Japanese Regulatory and Supervisory Framework and the EU Regulatory Regime for Credit Rating Agencies | CESR Archive, Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 4.59 MB |
||||
17/05/2011 | 2011/144 | Final advice- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 1.72 MB |
||||
12/01/2012 | 2012/3 | Annual report on the application of the Regulation on credit rating agencies as provided by Article 21(5) and Article 39a of the Regulation (EU) No 1060/2009 as amended by Regulation No 1095/2010 | Credit Rating Agencies | Final Report | PDF 141.98 KB |
This is the first report under the new CRA regulation, however, please note that CESR published a report about the application of the Regulation in the EU and, in particular, on the implementation of the requirements established in Annex I of the Regulation on 6 December 2010 (CESR/10-1424), according to Article 21(4) of the Regulation which was subsequently amended by Regulation No (EC) 513/2011. At the time of publication, 16 CRA's have been registered. | |||
22/03/2012 | 2012/207 | ESMA’s Report on the Supervision of Credit Rating Agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Final Report | PDF 323.81 KB |
This report provides an overview of ESMA’s supervisory activity on Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) registered in the European Union and summarises the results of ESMA’s first examination of the three groups of registered CRAs (Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Services, and Standard & Poor's Rating Services). The examination referred to in this document is the first step in an ongoing supervisory process conducted by ESMA and therefore does not represent a full scope investigation. The observations set forth in this Report refer to common issues affecting CRAs activities. As of the date of this document, ESMA has not determined whether any observation highlighted below constitutes a breach of the provisions of the Regulation. ESMA is still progressing in its assessment of the areas discussed in this Report. This Report is not based on a decision by ESMA’s Board of Supervisors; therefore it is published without prejudice to the possibility of further investigations which could lead to enforcement or supervisory actions. | |||
18/04/2012 | 2012/259 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence- US, Canada and Australia | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 697.78 KB |
On 12 June 2009 the European Commission requested CESR, now ESMA, to provide its technical advice on the equivalence between the legal and supervisory framework of Japan, The United States, and Canada with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. (Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies ). On 17 November 2009, the Commission also requested CESR to provide its technical advice on Australia. On 28 September 2010, the European Commission published an equivalence decision on Japan. With regard to the compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA had already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: - On 22 December 2011, Japan and Australia; - On 15 March 2012, US, Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore. This report sets out ESMA’s advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the US (Part I), Canada (Part II) and Australia (Part III) respective legal and supervisory frameworks and the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. | |||
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
27/09/2012 | 2012/600 Annex VIII | Impact assessment- Annex VIII of the Final report on draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Regulation (EU) 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories | Post Trading | Final Report | PDF 2.32 MB |
||||
03/01/2013 | 2012/874 | Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the budgetary implications of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) | Post Trading | Final Report | PDF 526.73 KB |
||||
15/03/2013 | 2013/312 | Regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 151.67 KB |
||||
18/03/2013 | 2013/308 | Annual report on the application of the Regulation on credit rating agencies- 2012 | Credit Rating Agencies | Final Report | PDF 601.08 KB |
This is the second annual report on the application of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation. | |||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
27/03/2013 | 2013/428 | EMIR: A Fair Price for Safety and Transparency | Post Trading, Speeches | Speech | PDF 113.31 KB |
EMIR: A Fair Price for Safety and Transparency - speech by Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, at the EMIR conference in the Hague |
|||
04/04/2013 | 2013/302 | ESMA’s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.08 MB |
On 14 January 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating a Regulation on fees for Trade Repositories (TRs) by a delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the proposed fee structures for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs. Respondents to this consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant data to support their arguments or proposals.Given the time period established for providing this advice, ESMA was compelled to require responses to the consultation within a short timeframe. In total, ESMA received 8 responses to the consultation. Non-confidential responses can be found on ESMA’s website. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input given the short period ESMA was able to consult for. This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the fee structure for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs in the EU and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on fees for TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered how best to adjust the original proposals. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission as they work on the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on fees for TRs. |
|||
31/05/2013 | 2013/626 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence on Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 840.48 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has provided advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies and the respective legal and supervisory frameworks of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is in response to the European Commission’s request for technical advice from ESMA on the equivalence of these jurisdictions legal and supervisory frameworks with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies as set out in Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies. The European Commission has already published equivalence decisions on US, Canada and Australia, on 9 October 2012, and on Japan, 28 October 2010. Regarding compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA has already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: 15 March 2012, Hong Kong and Singapore; 18 April 2012, Argentina and Mexico; 27 April 2012, Brazil. | |||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1157 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – US | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 5.06 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1158 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Japan | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.76 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1159 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Australia | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.82 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1161 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Singapore | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.55 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1162 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Switzerland | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.65 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1160 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Hong Kong | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.57 MB |