ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
239
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Trade Repositories X Securitisation X Securities Financing Transactions X MiFID - Investor Protection X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X Market Integrity X Prospectus X Annual Report X Consultation Paper X Final Report X Report X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
15/11/2018 ESMA70-145-1081 Annual report on administrative and criminal sanctions and other administrative measures under MAR , Annual Report PDF
158.47 KB
18/10/2018 ESMA 50-165-670 Annual statistical report of the EU Derivatives Markets- 2018 Report PDF
1.37 MB
09/12/2019 ESMA 50-157-2025 ASR on EU Derivatives markets- 2019 Report PDF
1.9 MB
16/11/2020 ESMA50-165-1362 ASR on EU derivatives markets- 2020 , Report PDF
1.88 MB
17/12/2021 ESMA50-165-2001 ASR on EU Derivatives markets- 2021 , Report PDF
1.92 MB
30/11/2020 ESMA-50-165-1355 ASR on EU Securities markets- 2020 Report PDF
1.69 MB

This document has been updated on 30 November 2020 to include footnotes indicating the cut off date for the reference and transparency data used as a basis for certain analyses.

17/12/2021 ESMA50-165-2004 ASR on EU Securities markets- 2021 , Report PDF
1.2 MB
25/02/2015 2015/494 Best Execution under MiFID , Final Report PDF
761.62 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain.
17/07/2019 ESMA35-43-1905 Call for evidence Impact of the inducements and costs and charges disclosure requirements under MiFID II Consultation Paper PDF
479.41 KB
30/09/2019 ESMA-35-43-2090 Call for evidence on MiFID II product intervention powers Consultation Paper PDF
197.51 KB
01/10/2021 ESMA35-43-2827 Call for evidence on retail investor protection aspects Consultation Paper PDF
357.05 KB
07/05/2012 2012/278 Call for evidence on Transaction reporting Consultation Paper PDF
286 KB
This call for evidence seeks to collect interested parties’ views on what elements ESMA should consider in its work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting, as well as opinions on what areas of the OTC derivatives guidelines need to be updated. On the basis of responses received to this call for evidence, ESMA will define its further work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting and launch a full public consultation.
18/01/2018 ESMA35-43-904 Call for Evidence – Potential product intervention measures on contracts for differences and binary options to retail clients Consultation Paper PDF
306.85 KB
26/01/2011 2011/35 Call for evidence- Request for technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU , Consultation Paper PDF
3.85 MB
10/06/2013 2013/619 Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Report PDF
2.15 MB
10/06/2013 2013/619 Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive , Final Report PDF
596.91 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive.   This is the first report of its kind and provides a comparison of liability regimes covering the EEA – comprising the 27 EU Member States along with Iceland and Norway and is aimed at providing clarity for market participants about the different regimes in place. The report contains an overview of the different arrangements and frameworks in place in  EEA States to address administrative, criminal, civil and governmental liability, and provides clarity to market participants about the different regimes in place. The report was compiled in response to a European Commission request of January 2011 for assistance in identifying and monitoring the different regimes in EEA states.   The report does not cover how the regimes, or sanctions, are applied.    Report Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Annex III Individual responses from EEA States
19/12/2018 ESMA35-43-1210 Consulation paper on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II Consultation Paper
24/09/2021 ESMA35-43-2836 Consultation on Review of the MiFID II framework on best execution reports Consultation Paper PDF
452.96 KB
15/07/2019 ESMA35-43-2019 Consultation paper on compliance function guidelines Consultation Paper PDF
677.15 KB
05/10/2016 2016/1436 Consultation Paper on Draft guidelines on MiFID II product governance requirements Consultation Paper PDF
661.2 KB

Pages