ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
109
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- CESR Archive (110) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (74) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (41) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Post Trading (40) Apply Post Trading filter
- Market Integrity (36) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (36) Apply Short Selling filter
- Fund Management (29) Apply Fund Management filter
- Corporate Disclosure (12) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- COVID-19 (12) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (12) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Market Abuse (12) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Prospectus (10) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (6) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Benchmarks (4) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Brexit (4) Apply Brexit filter
- Securitisation (4) Apply Securitisation filter
- Transparency (3) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Information (2) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (2) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Trade Repositories (1) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- Reference (239) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (110) Apply Press Release filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (90) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Letter (89) Apply Letter filter
- Final Report (70) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (64) Apply Statement filter
- Consultation Paper (61) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (59) Apply Report filter
- Summary of Conclusions (59) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Speech (42) Apply Speech filter
- Decision (21) Apply Decision filter
- Q&A (13) Apply Q&A filter
- Annual Report (11) Apply Annual Report filter
- Technical Standards (9) Apply Technical Standards filter
- SMSG Advice (3) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
Your filters
Audit X Management Board X IFRS Supervisory Convergence X Innovation and Products X Joint Committee X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Technical Advice X CESR Document X Compliance table X Opinion X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18/12/2014 | 2014/1378 | Opinion- Investment-based crowdfunding | Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 460.92 KB |
Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors. It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return. ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement. Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in this document. | |||
19/12/2014 | 2014/1569 | Technical Advice to the Commission on MiFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Advice | PDF 2.8 MB |
Reasons for publication The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) received a formal request (mandate) from the European Commission (Commission) on 23 April 2014 to provide technical advice to assist the Commission on the possible content of the delegated acts required by several provisions of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). The mandate focuses on technical issues which follow from MiFID II and MiFIR and is available on the European Commission website (here). ESMA was required to provide technical advice by no later than six months after the entry into force of MiFID II and MiFIR (2 July 2014). Contents This final report follows the same structure as the Consultation Paper (CP) published by ESMA on 22 May 2014 which is: (1) Introduction, (2) Investor protection, (3) Transparency, (4) Data publication, (5) Micro-structural issues, (6) Requirements applying on and to trading venues, (7) Commodity derivatives and (8) Portfolio compression. This paper also contains summaries of responses to the CP received by ESMA. The rationale of those items covered already in the CP for which no relevant changes have been introduced, is not developed again in this Final Report. ESMA recommends, therefore, to read this report together with the CP published on 22 May 2014 to have a complete vision of the rationale for ESMA’s technical advice. Next steps Delegated acts should be adopted by the Commission so that they enter into application by 30 months following the entry into force of the Directive and Regulation, taking into account the right of the European Parliament and Council to object to a delegated act within 3 months (which can be extended by a further 3 months). | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. | |||
14/08/2015 | 2015/1261 | Guidelines compliance table- Guidelines on the application of definitions C6 and C7 under MiFID I | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Compliance table | |||||
25/09/2015 | 2015/1462 | ESMA opinion on accounting for Deposit Guarantee Scheme | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Opinion | PDF 127.91 KB |
||||
02/05/2016 | 2016/666 | Opinion on draft RTS 2 non-equity transparency | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 193.79 KB |
||||
02/05/2016 | 2016/666 ANNEX | Annex- Opinion on draft RTS 2 non-equity transparency | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 633.28 KB |
||||
02/05/2016 | 2016/668 | Opinion on draft RTS 21 position limits | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 152.8 KB |
||||
02/05/2016 | 2016/668 ANNEX | Annex- Opinion on draft RTS 21 position limits | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 124.02 KB |
||||
30/05/2016 | 2016/730 | Opinion on draft RTS 20 on ancillary activity | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 148.29 KB |
||||
30/05/2016 | 2016/730 ANNEX | Annex- Opinion on draft RTS 20 on ancillary activity | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 220.42 KB |
||||
18/12/2013 | ESA/2013/035 | Joint Opinion-Review on the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) | Joint Committee | Opinion | PDF 142.63 KB |
Joint Opinion-Review on the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) | |||
12/05/2016 | ESA/2016/41 | Opinion of the ESAs- ECAI credit assessments | Credit Rating Agencies, Joint Committee | Opinion | PDF 379.79 KB |
||||
06/08/2020 | ESMA 70-155-9767 | Opinion on position limits on CEGH VTP | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 306.8 KB |
||||
06/08/2020 | ESMA-70-155-10052 | Opinion on position limits on PSV | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 233.92 KB |
||||
06/08/2020 | ESMA-70-155-10053 | Opinion on position limits on PEG | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 233.69 KB |
||||
24/10/2017 | ESMA-70-155-1818 | MiFID II position limits on aluminium contracts | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 130.07 KB |
||||
20/03/2019 | ESMA-70-155-5287 | Position limit notification for Hungarian Future | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 537.44 KB |
||||
06/08/2020 | ESMA-70-155-9763 | Opinion on position limits on GPL | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Opinion | PDF 233.61 KB |
||||
01/12/2020 | ESMA32-67-142 | Compliance table on ESMA Guidelines on the enforcement of financial information | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Compliance table | PDF 150.56 KB |