ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- (-) Remove Corporate Governance filter Corporate Governance
- (-) Remove Guidelines and Technical standards filter Guidelines and Technical standards
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- (-) Remove COVID-19 filter COVID-19
- CESR Archive (190) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (60) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (46) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (36) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (33) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Joint Committee (30) Apply Joint Committee filter
- CCP Directorate (22) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Disclosure (19) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (14) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Supervisory convergence (13) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Securitisation (10) Apply Securitisation filter
- Market Integrity (9) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Trading (9) Apply Trading filter
- Short Selling (8) Apply Short Selling filter
- Sustainable finance (6) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Market data (4) Apply Market data filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Information (2) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Crowdfunding (2) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Guidelines & Recommendations (567) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (114) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (114) Apply Reference filter
- Final Report (77) Apply Final Report filter
- Letter (73) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (71) Apply Statement filter
- Report (50) Apply Report filter
- Compliance table (44) Apply Compliance table filter
- Decision (28) Apply Decision filter
- Speech (22) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (20) Apply Opinion filter
- Technical Advice (13) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (8) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (6) Apply Annual Report filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14/04/2011 | 2011/114 | Consultation paper- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRA Supervision | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 95.52 KB |
||||
15/06/2011 | 2011/141 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.45 MB |
||||
26/05/2011 | 2011/155 | Call for evidence- assessment of compliance of credit rating agencies with Article 8.3 of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (1060/2009/EC) | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 69.4 KB |
||||
26/05/2011 | 2011/156 | Call for evidence- ratings data periodic reporting requirements for CRAs according to Article 21 (3)(e) of the Draft Amended CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 88.95 KB |
||||
14/09/2011 | 2011/288 | Call for evidence- Empty voting | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 81.13 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/302 | Consultation paper- Regulatory technical standards on the information to be provided to ESMA by a credit rating agency in its application for registration and certification and for the assessment of its systemic importance | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 276.02 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/303 | Consultation paper- Regulatory technical standards on the assessment of compliance of credit rating method-ologies with the requirements set out in Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 374.84 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/304 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the presentation of the information that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 182.29 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/305 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the content and format of ratings data periodic reporting to be submitted from credit rating agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 264 KB |
||||
26/01/2011 | 2011/35 | Call for evidence- Request for technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 3.85 MB |
||||
10/11/2011 | 2011/373 | Consultation paper- Considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 170.93 KB |
||||
13/12/2011 | 2011/444 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.15 MB |
The purpose of this consultation document from ESMA is to seek comments on the technical advice that ESMA proposes to give to the European Commission on a number of possible delegated acts. | |||
14/01/2011 | 2011/5 | Call for evidence- criteria for endorsement (Article 21 (2)(a) of the draft amended CRA Regulation) | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 218.02 KB |
||||
18/03/2011 | 2011/97 | Consultation paper- ESMA Guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under Article 4 (3) of the Credit Rating Regulation1060/2009 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 273.66 KB |
||||
22/03/2012 | 2012/212 | Discussion Paper- An Overview of the Proxy Advisory Industry. Considerations on Possible Policy Options | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Consultation Paper | PDF 524.85 KB |
This Discussion Paper focuses on the development of the proxy advisory industry in Europe, which mainly serves institutional investors such as asset managers, mutual funds and pension funds. Following its fact-finding work in 2011, ESMA recognises the proxy advisory industry within Europe is, or is expected to be, growing in prominence and investors are, or are expected to be, increasingly using proxy advisor services. In this paper ESMA identifies several key issues related to the proxy advisory market which may have an impact on the proper functioning of the voting process. The range of policy options that ESMA will consider, and on which it seeks further input from market participants, consists of four broad areas, including: 1. No EU-level action at this stage 2. Encouraging Member States and/or industry to develop standards 3. Quasi-binding EU-level regulatory instruments 4. Binding EU-level legislative instruments ESMA will consider these options based on the feedback it receives from market participants, and, if appropriate, will undertake further policy action, either directly or by providing an opinion to the European Commission. The reason to bring up some policy options is due to the fact that proxy advisors are currently not regulated at a pan-European level. Nevertheless, there are relevant European rules that apply to investors (e.g. for UCITS management companies when exercising voting rights). In addition, there are also well-recognised corporate governance standards that apply to issuers at a national level (based on the “comply or explain approach”) and some complements to improve standards of stewardship among investors. All feedback received from this Discussion Paper will be duly considered. ESMA expects to publish a feedback statement in Q4 of 2012 which will summarise the responses received and will state ESMA’s view on whether there is a need for policy action in this area. | |||
20/06/2012 | 2012/380 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.49 MB |
Responses to this consultation paper should be submitted online by 20 August 2012. | |||
01/10/2012 | 2012/607 | Further amendments to ESMA’s Recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectus Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 481.61 KB |
||||
20/12/2012 | 2012/841 | Guidelines and recommendations on the scope of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 255.36 KB |
||||
19/07/2013 | 2013/1013 | Guidelines on enforcement of financial information | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 540.55 KB |
Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking comments on all matters covered in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they: respond to the question stated; indicate the specific question to which the comment relates; contain a clear rationale; and describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. Deadline ESMA will consider all comments received by 15 October 2013. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Your input - Consultations” Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publicly disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Legal Notice”. Who should read this paper All interested parties are invited to respond to this consultation paper. It will primarily be of interest to those charged with the governance of issuers preparing financial information, users of financial information, auditors, and other parties who have a particular interest in financial reporting. |
|||
15/03/2013 | 2013/316 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 672.89 KB |
The Consultation Paper sets out a draft Regulatory Technical Standard concerning situations that require the systematic publication of a supplement to the prospectus which the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is obliged to develop in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The listed situations are concrete examples of the general obligation in Article 16(1) to mention in a supplement every significant new factor, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to information included in the prospectus which is capable of affecting the assessment of the securities. ESMA believes that the test whether a new factor, mistake or inaccuracy qualifies as a triggering event for producing a supplement is the same test as whether information should be included in the prospectus. As a consequence, significance or materiality should be assessed according to the same qualitative and/or quantitative criteria used when drafting the prospectus. In light of this, ESMA has identified a short list comprising 10 situations, which will always require issuers, offerors or persons asking for admission to trading to draw up and publish a supplement to the prospectus.The CP includes a draft Regulatory Technical Standard setting out the situations that would require a systematic publication of a supplement as well as the minimum content of such a supplement. Responses to the consultation should be submitted online by 28 June 2013. |