ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Corporate Information filter Corporate Information
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Board of Appeal filter Board of Appeal
- (-) Remove Audit filter Audit
- (-) Remove Crowdfunding filter Crowdfunding
- Press Releases (323) Apply Press Releases filter
- CESR Archive (256) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (56) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (48) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (37) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Post Trading (33) Apply Post Trading filter
- Joint Committee (32) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Board of Supervisors (29) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (28) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (24) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Management Board (23) Apply Management Board filter
- Brexit (16) Apply Brexit filter
- Benchmarks (14) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Trade Repositories (14) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Sustainable finance (13) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Innovation and Products (10) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- CCP Directorate (9) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Market Integrity (9) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Prospectus (9) Apply Prospectus filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (9) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Short Selling (9) Apply Short Selling filter
- Securitisation (8) Apply Securitisation filter
- Corporate Governance (6) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Planning reporting budget (6) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (6) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- COVID-19 (4) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (4) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- IAS Regulation (4) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (4) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Finance (3) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- International cooperation (3) Apply International cooperation filter
- European Single Electronic Format (2) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Market data (2) Apply Market data filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Press Release filter Press Release
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Reference (254) Apply Reference filter
- Letter (218) Apply Letter filter
- Opinion (102) Apply Opinion filter
- Annual Report (83) Apply Annual Report filter
- Final Report (78) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (74) Apply Statement filter
- Consultation Paper (63) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (51) Apply Report filter
- Speech (37) Apply Speech filter
- Decision (28) Apply Decision filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (24) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Compliance table (12) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Standards (11) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Technical Advice (6) Apply Technical Advice filter
- CESR Document (4) Apply CESR Document filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Summary of Conclusions (1) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19/12/2016 | 2016/1673 | 2016-1673 Q&A on MiFID II commodity derivatives topics | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Q&A | PDF 338.93 KB |
||||
21/12/2016 | 2016/1682 | 2016-1682 Press Release on Feedback Statement on ESEF | Corporate Disclosure, European Single Electronic Format, Press Releases, Transparency | Press Release | PDF 225.03 KB |
||||
28/01/2016 | 2016/167 | Anneli Tuominen appointed Vice Chair of ESMA | Corporate Information, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 139.35 KB |
||||
18/04/2018 | ESMA71-99-969 | Board of Appeal Appointments 2018 | Board of Appeal | Press Release | PDF 292.64 KB |
||||
13/03/2019 | BoA PR 01 | Board of Appeal PR- Shadow Ratings Appeals | Board of Appeal | Press Release | PDF 399.67 KB |
||||
12/03/2021 | ESMA71-99-1589 | ED Announcement PR | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Management Board | Press Release | PDF 78.78 KB |
||||
01/10/2019 | ESMA71-99-1220 | ESMA 2020 WP | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Management Board, Planning reporting budget, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 106.92 KB |
||||
29/05/2019 | ESMA71-99-1168 | ESMA adjusts application of the trading obligation for shares in a no-deal Brexit | Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 87.46 KB |
||||
29/05/2019 | ESMA71-99-1168 | ESMA adjusts application of the trading obligation for shares in a no-deal Brexit | Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 87.46 KB |
||||
01/03/2012 | 2012/140 | ESMA advises European Commission on Prospectus Directive’s overhaul- Advice covers possible delegated acts | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 115.14 KB |
||||
13/10/2016 | 2016 IFRS Press Release | ESMA and IFRS® Foundation strengthen cooperation | Corporate Information, IAS Regulation, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Press Release | PDF 213.42 KB |
||||
11/11/2013 | 2013/1635 | ESMA announces financial statements’ enforcement priorities for 2013 | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 94.29 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its European Common Enforcement Priorities (Priorities) for 2013. These Priorities are to be used by European Economic Area (EEA) national authorities in their assessment of listed companies’ 2013 financial statements. ESMA has defined these Priorities in order to promote the consistent application of IFRS across the EEA. Listed companies and their auditors should take account of the areas set out in the Priorities when preparing and auditing the IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2013. The Priorities identified refer to the application of IFRS in relation to: • Impairment of non-financial assets; • Measurement and disclosure of post-employment benefit obligations; • Fair value measurement and disclosure; • Disclosures related to significant accounting policies, judgements and estimates; and • Measurement of financial instruments and disclosure of related risks. Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, said: “ESMA, in setting out these enforcement priorities for listed companies financial statements, aims to ensure that the IFRS recognition, measurement and disclosure principles are consistently applied across the EEA. “Consistent application of accounting standards is a key factor in ensuring the transparency and accuracy of the financial information which investors rely upon, and ultimately contributes to the proper functioning of Europe’s capital markets. “Finally, considering the focus on asset quality in the financial sector, listed financial institutions and their auditors should pay particular attention to properly measuring financial instruments and the accurate disclosure of related risks.” ESMA and the national competent authorities will monitor the application of the IFRS requirements outlined in the Priorities, with national authorities incorporating them into their reviews and taking corrective actions where appropriate. In addition to these Priorities, national authorities may also focus on other locally relevant areas as part of their review. Therefore, national enforcement processes may not be limited to the specific issues contained in this statement. ESMA will collect data on how European listed entities have applied the Priorities and will publish its findings on these Priorities in early 2015. It expects to publish its findings on the 2012 Priorities in early 2014. |
|||
26/06/2015 | 2015/1049 | ESMA announces the appointment of new chairs to Standing Committees | Corporate Information, Board of Supervisors, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 105.46 KB |
||||
20/05/2021 | ESMA71-99-1672 | ESMA appoints Natasha Cazenave as Executive Director | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information | Press Release | PDF 80.81 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, has appointed Natasha Cazenave as its new Executive Director. Ms. Cazenave will take up her position on 1 June 2021. |
|||
12/05/2022 | ESMA71-99-1943 | ESMA appoints new member to its Management Board- Press release | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Management Board, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 94.01 KB |
||||
14/11/2013 | 2013/1650 | ESMA begins preparatory work for new Market Abuse Regime | Market Abuse, Market Integrity, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 95.26 KB |
ESMA begins preparatory work for new Market Abuse Regime The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a Discussion Paper setting out its initial views on the implementing measures it will have to develop for the new Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). MAR aims to enhance market integrity and investor protection. It will achieve this by updating and strengthening the existing market abuse framework, by extending its scope to new markets and trading strategies, and by introducing new requirements. The Discussion Paper presents positions and regulatory options on those issues where ESMA will have to develop MAR implementing measures, likely to include Regulatory Technical Standards, Delegated Acts and Guidelines. These implementing measures are of fundamental importance to the new regime, as they set out how MAR’s enlarged scope is to be implemented in practice by market participants, trading platforms, investors, issuers and persons related to financial markets. In developing these regulatory options ESMA, where similar requirements already exist under the current Market Abuse Directive (MAD), has taken into consideration the existing MAD Level 2 texts and ESMA/CESR guidelines to set out the DP positions in light of the extended scope of MAR. This Discussion Paper is based on the version of the MAR Level 1 text agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on 24 June 2013. The closing date for responses is Monday 27 January 2014. MAR Policy Areas The DP covers ten sections of MAR where ESMA is expected to have to provide input, these include: • conditions to be met by buyback programmes and stabilization measures to benefit from the exemption from market abuse prohibitions; • arrangement and procedures required for market soundings, from the perspective of both the sounding and the sounded market participants; • indicators and signals of market manipulation; • criteria to establish Accepted Market Practices; • arrangement, systems and procedures to put in place for the purpose of suspicious transactions and order reporting as well as its content and format; • issues relating to public disclosure of inside information and the conditions for delay; • format for insider lists; • issues concerning the reporting and public disclosure of managers’ transactions; • arrangements for fair presentation and disclosure of conflicts of interests by producers and disseminators of investment recommendations; • reporting of violations and related procedures. Next steps ESMA will consider the feedback it receives to this consultation in Q1 2014 and incorporate it in to its full consultation papers on both its draft Technical Standards and Technical Advice to the Commission. The dates for these consultations are will depend on the publication of the final version of MAR. Notes for editors 1. 2013/1649 Discussion Paper - ESMA’s policy orientations on possible implementing measures under the Market Abuse Regulation 2. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) (MAR) 3. ESMA is an independent EU Authority that was established on 1 January 2011 and works closely with the other European Supervisory Authorities responsible for banking (EBA), and insurance and occupational pensions (EIOPA), and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). 4. ESMA’s mission is to enhance the protection of investors and promote stable and well-functioning financial markets in the European Union (EU). As an independent institution, ESMA achieves this aim by building a single rule book for EU financial markets and ensuring its consistent application across the EU. ESMA contributes to the regulation of financial services firms with a pan-European reach, either through direct supervision or through the active co-ordination of national supervisory activity. Press Release 2013/1650 Discussion Paper 2013/1649 | |||
12/11/2013 | 2013/1645 | ESMA clarifies shareholder cooperation in takeover situations | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 86.55 KB |
ESMA clarifies shareholder cooperation in takeover situations The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a statement on practices governed by the Takeover Bid Directive (TBD), focused on shareholder cooperation issues relating to acting in concert and the appointment of board members. The statement contains a White List of activities that shareholders can cooperate on without the presumption of acting in concert. It also contains information on how shareholders may cooperate in order to secure board member appointments by setting out factors that national authorities may take into account when considering whether shareholders are acting in concert. The statement is in response to a request by the European Commission for clarity on these issues, following its 2012 report on the application of the TBD. It is based on information collected about the TBD’s application and common practices across the European Economic Area (EEA). The statement was prepared by the Takeover Bids Network, a permanent working group, under ESMA’s auspices, that promotes the exchange of information on practices and application of the TBD across EEA. Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, said: “Today’s statement means that shareholders can now be confident that they can expect authorities to take a consistent approach across the EEA to their cooperative activities. This consistency should in turn provide the reassurance needed by shareholders for the effective, sustainable engagement that is one of the cornerstones of listed companies’ corporate governance model allowing them to hold their boards to account. “ESMA believes that ensuring a consistent and convergent supervisory approach to this issue will be instrumental in affording equality of treatment to shareholders and investors across the EEA.” National competent authorities will have regard to the White List when determining whether shareholders are persons acting in concert under national takeover rules, but will also take into account all other relevant factors in making their decisions. Shareholder cooperation and acting in concert - The White List When shareholders cooperate to engage in any of the activities listed below, that cooperation will not, in and of itself, lead to a conclusion that the shareholders are acting in concert: 1. entering into discussions with each other about possible matters to be raised with the company’s board; 2. making representations to the company’s board about company policies, practices or particular actions that the company might consider taking; 3. other than in relation to the appointment of board members, exercising shareholders’ statutory rights; 4. other than in relation to a resolution for the appointment of board members and insofar as such a resolution is provided for under national company law, agreeing to vote the same way on a particular resolution put to a general meeting. If shareholders cooperate in an activity not included on the White List, this will also not result in an automatic assumption that they are acting in concert. Each case will be determined on its own particular facts. Cooperation in relation to the appointment of members of the board of a company The White List does not include any activity relating to cooperation on board appointments, due to differences in Member State approaches towards determining whether shareholders who cooperate in relation to board appointments are acting in concert. However, shareholders may wish to cooperate in order to secure board members’ appointment in a company in which they have invested. This cooperation might take the form of: 1. entering into an agreement or arrangement (informal or formal) to exercise their votes in the same way in order to support the appointment of one or more board members; 2. tabling a resolution to remove one or more board members and replace them with one or more new board members; or 3. tabling a resolution to appoint one or more additional board members. The statement therefore indicates which factors may be considered when assessing whether such cooperation is indeed an act of acting in concert. ESMA will keep the public statement under review in order to ensure that it continues to reflect accurately the practices and application of the TBD in the Member States. 2013/1642 Public Statement - Information on shareholder cooperation and acting in concert under the Takeover Bids Directive. 2013/1643 Cover Note to the Public Statement | |||
03/10/2016 | 2016/1425 | ESMA consults on consolidated tape for non-equity products | MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 144.25 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued today a consultation paper on its draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) regarding the creation of a consolidated tape for non-equity instruments which is required under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). The new MiFID II framework, which covers equity-like and non-equity instruments traded on trading venues, introduces provisions for establishing a central source of post-trade prices or consolidated tape. ESMA, having already issued its draft RTS on an equity tape, is seeking feedback on its draft RTS for the non-equity tape. In order to create the non-equity tape, trading venues and approved publication arrangements (APAs) will send real-time post-trade data to consolidated tape providers (CTPs), who will consolidate this data in real-time and make the data available to the public. |
|||
13/02/2014 | 2014/174 | ESMA consults on Guidelines for issuers performance measures | Corporate Disclosure, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 76.4 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a consultation on Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures (APMs). The aim of the guidelines is to encourage European issuers to publish transparent, unbiased and comparable information on their financial performance in order to provide users with a better understanding of their performance. Some examples of APMs include EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Tax), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation), free cash flow, underlying profit or net-debt. The Consultation Paper follows on from ESMA’s decision to review and replace the 2005 CESR Recommendation on APMs with Guidelines under Article 16 of the ESMA Regulation to tackle concerns about APMs used by issuers. Those relate mainly to APMs being used in such a manner as to present a confusing or optimistic picture of their performance by removing certain negative aspects, or even where this is not the case, APMs can be misleading if they are inconsistently calculated or presented. The proposed guidelines set out the principles that issuers should follow when presenting APMs, and are based on the requirements applicable to financial statements, as required by the IAS Regulation, mainly referring to their labelling, calculation, presentation and comparability.Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, said: “The proposed guidelines aim to improve the transparency and comparability of financial information published by issuers. APMs presented in an appropriate way may reduce information asymmetry among the users of financial statements.“These guidelines will ensure that APMs are used and presented in a coherent fashion across the EU, which will in turn contribute to restoring confidence in the accuracy and usefulness of financial information and improve investor protection.” The proposed guidelines would apply to issuers with securities traded on regulated markets and all competent authorities and other bodies in the EU that undertake enforcement activities under the Transparency Directive. The proposed guidelines are aligned with other regulations and guidance issued by securities regulators in the United States, Australia and Canada on this matter. The closing date for responses to this consultation is 14 May 2014 and ESMA expects to publish the final guidelines in the fourth quarter of 2014. |
|||
21/03/2014 | 2014/302 | ESMA consults on major shareholders disclosures | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Press Release | PDF 93.61 KB |
ESMA consults on major shareholders disclosures The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the revised Transparency Directive relating to the notification of major shareholdings and the indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements. The consultation runs until 30 May 2014. The revised Directive harmonises transparency requirements relating to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on an EU regulated market. This harmonisation aims to enhance transparency in respect of the ownership structure of an issuer, to improve legal certainty and reduce the administrative burden for cross-border investors. The revised Transparency Directive also addresses the issue of the disclosure regime for new types of financial instruments that expose investors to an economic risk similar to when holding shares. The draft RTS support these objectives by facilitating the creation of a harmonised regime regarding the aggregation of holdings of shares and financial instruments, the calculation of notification thresholds and the exemptions from notification requirements. Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, said: “Transparency is essential for ensuring that markets function properly and investors are afforded adequate protection when making investment decisions. “Today’s proposals support the aims of the Transparency Directive to improve the effectiveness of the transparency regime on corporate ownership. Clarity on this issue will ensure that shareholders and potential investors are in possession of the information needed to make informed investment decisions.” Draft Regulatory Technical Standards The draft RTS on the major shareholding notifications addresses the following issues: • Method of calculation of 5% threshold exemption regarding trading books and market makers; • Calculation method regarding a basket of shares or an index; • Methods for determining the ‘delta’ for calculating voting rights; and • Exemptions regarding notification of financial instruments. The Consultation Paper also sets out the proposed content of an indicative list of financial instruments which should be subject to the notification requirements laid down in the Directive, and outlines the processes for updating that list. The input from stakeholders will help ESMA in drafting the final report and determining the content of the draft RTS. Comments to this consultation can be submitted via ESMA’s website and the deadline for submission is 30 May 2014. |