REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|23/03/2011||2011/36||Public statement- Framework for third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Statement||PDF
|23/03/2011||2011/37||Public statement- ESMA statement on Israeli laws and regulations on prospectuses||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Statement||PDF
|17/05/2011||2011/BS/123||Decision of the Board of Supervisors- Appointment of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Board of Supervisors, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Decision||PDF
|19/12/2011||2011/BS/229||Decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority establishing its Review Panel||Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Supervisory convergence||Decision||PDF
|This decision establishes the Review Panel of ESMA and sets out its mandate.|
|18/12/2013||2013/1944||Format of the base prospectus and consistent application of Article 26(4) of the Prospectus Regulation||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Opinion||PDF
|20/03/2013||2013/317||Framework for the assessment of third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Opinion||PDF
|10/11/2016||2016-1563||Issues for consideration in implementing IFRS 9: Financial Instruments||Audit, Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence||Statement||PDF
|30/09/2016||2016/1408||ESMA appoints new chairs to Standing Committees||Board of Supervisors, Fund Management, Market Integrity, MiFID - Investor Protection||Statement||PDF
The Board of Supervisors of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has appointed the following individuals to serve as chairs of its standing committees:
The standing committees are expert groups drawn from ESMA staff and the national competent authorities for securities markets regulation in the Member States, and are responsible for the development of policy in their respective areas. The appointments are for a period of two years and commence with immediate effect.
|08/02/2016||2016/268||Opinion on equivalence of Turkish prospectus regime||Prospectus||Opinion||PDF
|31/03/2016||2016/408||Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR
DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU.
In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’).
Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates.
|13/06/2016||2016/943||Statement by Verena Ross at ECON Public Hearing on Securitisation||Board of Supervisors, Speeches||Statement||PDF
|25/11/2020||70-155-8842||ESMA statement on DTO Final||Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Statement||PDF
|05/02/2019||ESMA 70-155-7026||Use of UK data in ESMA databases in case of a no-deal Brexit||Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC||Statement||PDF
|12/10/2020||ESMA22-105-1248||Steven Maijoor Opening Statement for ECON Hearing 12 October 2020||Board of Supervisors, Brexit, Corporate Information, COVID-19, Joint Committee, Speeches||Statement||PDF
|11/02/2020||ESMA22-328-356||Decision of the Board of Supervisors- Election of Management Board Members||Board of Supervisors, Management Board||Decision||PDF
|30/09/2020||ESMA31-62-1491||Public statement QA update Prospectus||Prospectus||Statement||PDF
|15/03/2019||ESMA33-5-735||ESMA statement on the endorsement of UK credit ratings in case of a no-deal Brexit||Brexit, Credit Rating Agencies||Statement||PDF
|03/04/2020||ESMA34-39-969||Public Statement of Consultation Practices||Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information||Statement||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1328||Brexit Statement- information to clients||Brexit, MiFID - Investor Protection||Statement||PDF
|13/01/2021||ESMA35-43-2509||Reminder to firms of the MiFID II rules on ‘reverse solicitation’ in the context of the recent end of the UK transition period||Brexit, MiFID - Investor Protection||Statement||PDF