ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Corporate Information filter Corporate Information
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Corporate Finance filter Corporate Finance
- (-) Remove Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group
- Speeches (156) Apply Speeches filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (103) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (73) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Market Integrity (37) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (35) Apply Short Selling filter
- Fund Management (30) Apply Fund Management filter
- CESR Archive (26) Apply CESR Archive filter
- COVID-19 (15) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Supervisory convergence (13) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Brexit (12) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Disclosure (8) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (8) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Sustainable finance (8) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Joint Committee (7) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Board of Supervisors (6) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Securitisation (6) Apply Securitisation filter
- CCP Directorate (5) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (5) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (3) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Trading (3) Apply Trading filter
- International cooperation (2) Apply International cooperation filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (2) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Trade Repositories (2) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Market data (1) Apply Market data filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Speech filter Speech
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- Reference (324) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (101) Apply Press Release filter
- Consultation Paper (94) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Final Report (92) Apply Final Report filter
- SMSG Advice (89) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Annual Report (81) Apply Annual Report filter
- Letter (77) Apply Letter filter
- Report (74) Apply Report filter
- Statement (74) Apply Statement filter
- Summary of Conclusions (41) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (28) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Technical Advice (22) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Q&A (15) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (14) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Standards (10) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Decision (9) Apply Decision filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19/09/2012 | 2012/579 | Statement by Steven Maijoor at the ECON hearing on 19/09/2012 | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 190.14 KB |
Statement given by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA, at the ECON hearing in the European Parliament on 19 September 2012 | |||
04/12/2012 | 2012/800 | ESMA’s role in markets reform- Verena Ross, ESMA Executive Director | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 147.98 KB |
Verena Ross, ESMA Executive Director, delivered the keynote address at the ICI Global Trading and Market Structure Conference in London. | |||
04/12/2012 | 2012/803 | Rebuilding investors trust in EU capital markets- Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 150.43 KB |
Steven Maijoor, Chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), delivered the keynote address at the DSW Finuse Conference in Wiesbaden on 4 December 2012. | |||
18/12/2013 | 2013/1944 | Format of the base prospectus and consistent application of Article 26(4) of the Prospectus Regulation | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Opinion | PDF 75.6 KB |
||||
11/03/2013 | 2013/279 | "Regulation of systemically important financial institutions and of the shadow banking system"- speech by Steven Maijoor, Chair, at the CDU/CSU congress in Berlin | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 102.94 KB |
||||
15/03/2013 | 2013/312 | Regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 151.67 KB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/317 | Framework for the assessment of third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Opinion | PDF 725.59 KB |
||||
27/03/2013 | 2013/428 | EMIR: A Fair Price for Safety and Transparency | Post Trading, Speeches | Speech | PDF 113.31 KB |
EMIR: A Fair Price for Safety and Transparency - speech by Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, at the EMIR conference in the Hague |
|||
24/05/2013 | 2013/603 | ESAs—Achievement and Challenges, by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 87.87 KB |
ESAs – Achievement and Challenges Public Hearing on Financial Supervision in the EU 24 May 2013, Brussels Speech by Steven Maijoor, Chair |
|||
06/11/2014 | 2014/1339 | Capital Markets Union: building competitive, efficient capital markets trusted by investors | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 124.34 KB |
Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, spoke at the joint EU Commission/Italian Presidency Growth for Finance Conference in Brussels - " Excerpts "Following its launch by President Juncker in July 2014, the Capital Markets Union (CMU) is now a concept under construction and I am very happy to have been invited to contribute today to its development. When doing so, we should remember the clear objective from President Juncker who stated that the CMU should maximise the benefits of capital markets and non-bank financial institutions for the real economy. "Despite the many efforts of the past four decades, and the good results achieved, the EU capital market is still fragmented which limits its potential. For example, an institutional investor wanting to invest in a mid-sized company will still have a strong bias towards companies in its own Member-State. There are transactions not happening that otherwise would be beneficial both for the investor and the company because of this home bias. The reason for this stems from a complex set of barriers relating to such issues as transparency of Small and Medium-sized Entities (SMEs), differences in their governance and cross-border differences in the ownership of shares. In sum, we are only halfway there. While the EU capital market has integrated steadily in the past four decades it is not yet comparable with, for example, the US capital market. With a five year time-horizon in mind, what is needed to achieve a strong and integrated capital market to increase capital availability and to support economic growth in all 28 Member States? In my view, there are four main building blocks: (1) greater diversity in funding; (2) increasing the efficiency of capital markets; (3) strengthening and harmonisation of supervision; and (4) increasing the attractiveness of capital markets both for EU investors and for investors from outside the Union. "The CMU should be based on an accelerated integration of the capital markets of the 28 Member States. The end goal should be a CMU that is competitive, efficient and that provides a wide range of funding channels. Above all, it should be trusted by investors." | |||
18/12/2014 | 2014/1378 | Opinion- Investment-based crowdfunding | Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 460.92 KB |
Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors. It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return. ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement. Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in this document. | |||
19/11/2014 | 2014/1382 | Regulatory measures to prevent another crisis- speech by Steven Maijoor | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 226.16 KB |
Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA, gave the keynote speech at the "Regulatory measures to prevent another crisis?" event organised by the CFA Institute in Brussels, Belgium. | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. | |||
07/05/2014 | 2014/478 | Keynote Speech at AFME Post Trade Conference- The reform of financial markets: halfway there- Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair | Post Trading | Speech | PDF 220.01 KB |
Keynote Speech - The reform of financial markets: halfway there Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair AFME Post Trade Conference, London Excerpt "Three challenges Ladies and gentlemen, so far so good about the completion of the legislation to meet our G20 commitments and developing a single rulebook for financial services. Let me now turn to the three main challenges I see in the current phase of regulatory reform. My main message is that while the legislative phase nears completion, it does not imply the completion of the regulatory reform programme. Let me explain that further by identifying three commitments for the next phase of regulatory reform. Firstly, commitment to the financial reform, its implementation and to adequate supervision. Legislation needs to be accompanied by good implementing measures, to ensure the legislation works in practice, and credible supervision. Secondly, a commitment to supervisory convergence in order to establish a truly internal market and to prevent regulatory arbitrage within the EU. Agreeing at EU level on a single rule book for all 28 Member States is a big step. However, ensuring that this single rule book is supervised consistently across the 28 Member States is an even bigger step. Thirdly, in order to prevent crises we need commitment to the lessons learned from the crisis regarding risk analysis and the availability of high quality data on financial markets. We need more information on securities markets. Since the beginning of the financial crisis securities regulators have learned a lot about how to deal with financial stability – an area that was beforehand mainly reserved for central bankers and banking regulators. Information on financial markets is key to achieve the financial stability objective. It is therefore no surprise that many pieces of recently introduced legislation already include data requirements. Securities regulators however also need to step up their role on this and need more resources to collect and analyse data. It goes without saying that more data and analysis will also support our other important objective of investor protection." |
|||
28/05/2014 | 2014/576 | Voting Procedures for CCP colleges under EMIR | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 94.15 KB |
||||
14/09/2015 | 2015/1349 | Statement by Steven Maijoor ESMA Chair- ECON Hearing 14 September 2015 | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 108.95 KB |
||||
29/10/2015 | 2015/1615 | Steven Maijoor speech at ECN | Innovation and Products, Speeches | Speech | PDF 261.75 KB |
||||
17/11/2015 | 2015/1679 | Steven Maijoor Opening Statement ECON 17 Nov 2015 | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 105.09 KB |
||||
17/11/2015 | 2015/1680 | Verena Ross Statement ECON 17 Nov 2015 | Corporate Information, Speeches | Speech | PDF 164.34 KB |
||||
07/01/2016 | 2015/1912 | Opening Speech by J Servais, President of FSMA | Innovation and Products | Speech | PDF 162.44 KB |