ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
22
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Innovation and Products X Management Board X Securitisation X Fund Management X Market Abuse X Brexit X Corporate Disclosure X Q&A X Technical Standards X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
03/11/2020 ESMA71-99-1423 QA Fast Track Peer Review- Wirecard , , Q&A PDF
248.14 KB
28/05/2020 ESMA33-128-563 Questions and answers on the Securitisation Regulation Q&A PDF
1.18 MB
17/04/2020 ESMA32-51-370 Q&A on ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures , Q&A PDF
329.01 KB
04/12/2019 ESMA34-32-352 Q&A on the Application of the AIFMD , Q&A PDF
500.53 KB
11/04/2019 ESMA31-67-127 Question and answers on Transparency Directive (TD) , , , , Q&A PDF
352.79 KB
11/04/2019 ESMA31-62-780 Q&A on Prospectus Related Topics , , , , , , Q&A PDF
957.9 KB
29/03/2019 ESMA34-43-392 Q&A on the application of the UCITS Directive Q&A PDF
407.27 KB
29/03/2019 ESMA70-145-111 Q&A on the Market Abuse Regulation , Q&A PDF
400.21 KB

The purpose of this document is to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of MAR and its implementing measures. It does this by providing responses to questions posed by the general public and competent authorities in relation to the practical application of the MAR framework

The content of this document is aimed at competent authorities to ensure that in their supervisory activities and their actions are converging along the lines of the responses adopted by ESMA and at helping issuers, investors and other market participants by providing clarity on the content of the market abuse rules, rather than creating an extra layer of requirements.

16/12/2016 2016/1669 2016-1669 Q&A on AIFMD Q&A PDF
436.68 KB
21/11/2016 2016/1586 Questions and Answers on UCITS Directive Q&A PDF
454.07 KB
31/05/2016 2016/774 Q&A on the Application of the EuSEF and EuVECA Regulations Q&A PDF
212.93 KB
01/04/2016 2016/419 Q&A Market Abuse Directive Q&A PDF
175.08 KB
28/09/2015 2015-ESMA-1455 Final Report MAR TS Technical Standards PDF
1.77 MB
18/09/2015 2015/1409 Draft Implementing Technical Standards on penalties and measures under Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS Directive) Technical Standards PDF
339.52 KB
01/07/2015 2015/1014 Draft RTS on prospectus related issues under the Omnibus II Directive Technical Standards PDF
949.89 KB
01/07/2015 2015/1005 Questions and Answers: Investment-based crowdfunding: money laundering/terrorist financing Q&A PDF
157.73 KB
29/09/2014 2014/1187 Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive , Technical Standards PDF
810.07 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the revised Transparency Directive relating to the notification of major shareholdings.
20/02/2014 2014/161 Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuSEF Technical Standards PDF
29.18 KB
20/02/2014 2014/160 Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuVECA Technical Standards PDF
175.99 KB
20/12/2013 2013/1970 Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus , Technical Standards PDF
713.74 KB
The Final Report contains the draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) on situations which require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus which ESMA is required to submit to the European Commission by 1 January 2014 in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The Report furthermore includes a summary of the main responses received to ESMA’s Consultation Paper which was published in March 2013. The draft RTS sets out nine situations which are always considered to be significant in the context of securities issuance and where a supplement to the prospectus will always be required. Other situations would require a case-by-case assessment.