REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|03/03/2021||ESMA32-51-818||Letter to the EC on next steps following Wirecard||Corporate Disclosure, Guidelines and Technical standards, Supervisory convergence, Transparency||Letter||PDF
|27/10/2021||ESMA32-67-791||Letter to IFRS IC on classification of SPAC shares as equity or liability (IAS 32)||IAS Regulation, IFRS Supervisory Convergence, MiFID - Investor Protection, Prospectus||Letter||PDF
|28/10/2016||2016/1529||Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders||Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|06/01/2012||2012/10||Interpretation of the Mineral Companies Recommendations for cement companies||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Letter||PDF
|Open letter regarding Interpretation of the Mineral Companies Recommendations for cement companies|
|31/05/2016||2016/732||Guidelines on participant default rules and procedures under CSDR||Guidelines and Technical standards, Post Trading||Consultation Paper||PDF
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) under Article 41(4) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation No 236/2012 (CSDR) may issue guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 in order to ensure consistent application of Article 41 of CSDR relating to participant default rules and procedures.
Section 2 contains information on the background and mandate, Section 3 contains an analysis of the scope and content of the proposed guidelines, while Section 4 contains the proposed guidelines.
Annex I sets out a summary of the questions contained in this paper and Annex II includes a high level cost-benefit analysis for the guidelines.
ESMA will consider the feedback it will receive to this consultation with a view to finalising the guidelines by Q4 2016.
|01/10/2012||2012/607||Further amendments to ESMA’s Recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectus Regulation regarding mineral companies||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|23/03/2011||2011/67||Feedback statement- Consultation Paper on proposed amendments to CESR||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||CESR Document||PDF
|20/03/2013||2013/318||Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency||CESR Document||PDF
|13/12/2011||2011/444||ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|The purpose of this consultation document from ESMA is to seek comments on the technical advice that ESMA proposes to give to the European Commission on a number of possible delegated acts.|
|01/03/2012||2012/138||ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Letter||PDF
|20/06/2012||2012/380||ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|Responses to this consultation paper should be submitted online by 20 August 2012.|
|09/01/2013||2012/878||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Letter||PDF
|13/04/2018||ESMA40-133-624||ESMA's response to WP29 Consultation on Guidelines on Derogations||International cooperation, Supervisory convergence||Letter||PDF
|21/05/2015||2015/857||ESMA response to the European Commission consultation on the review of the Prospectus Directive||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Letter||PDF
|15/02/2022||ESMA24-436-1152||ESMA response to the Commission consultation on the Listings Act||Market Abuse, MiFID - Investor Protection, Prospectus||Letter||PDF
|06/07/2017||ESMA31-62-650||Draft technical advice on scrutiny and approval of the prospectus||Prospectus||Consultation Paper||PDF
|06/07/2017||ESMA31-62-532||Draft technical advice on format and content of the prospectus||Prospectus||Consultation Paper||PDF
|06/07/2017||ESMA31-62-649||Draft technical advice on content and format of the EU Growth prospectus||Prospectus||Consultation Paper||PDF
|15/03/2013||2013/316||Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|The Consultation Paper sets out a draft Regulatory Technical Standard concerning situations that require the systematic publication of a supplement to the prospectus which the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is obliged to develop in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The listed situations are concrete examples of the general obligation in Article 16(1) to mention in a supplement every significant new factor, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to information included in the prospectus which is capable of affecting the assessment of the securities. ESMA believes that the test whether a new factor, mistake or inaccuracy qualifies as a triggering event for producing a supplement is the same test as whether information should be included in the prospectus. As a consequence, significance or materiality should be assessed according to the same qualitative and/or quantitative criteria used when drafting the prospectus. In light of this, ESMA has identified a short list comprising 10 situations, which will always require issuers, offerors or persons asking for admission to trading to draw up and publish a supplement to the prospectus.The CP includes a draft Regulatory Technical Standard setting out the situations that would require a systematic publication of a supplement as well as the minimum content of such a supplement. Responses to the consultation should be submitted online by 28 June 2013.|
|29/09/2017||70-145-105||Draft Guidelines on non-significant benchmarks||Benchmarks, Guidelines and Technical standards||Consultation Paper||PDF