ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
25
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
International cooperation X Corporate Information X Market Abuse X Joint Committee X MiFID - Investor Protection X Technical Standards X SMSG Advice X Decision X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
04/01/2022 ESMA22-106-3800 SMSG response to ESMA on its Call for evidence on the EC mandate on certain aspects relating to retail investor protection , SMSG Advice PDF
374.84 KB
07/01/2022 ESMA22-106-3809 SMSG response to ESAs on their joint Call for evidence on the European Commission mandate regarding the PRIIPs Regulation , , SMSG Advice PDF
325.26 KB
04/05/2022 ESMA22-106-4032 SMSG advice to the ESMA Consultation Paper on Guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID II suitability requirements , SMSG Advice PDF
274.55 KB
07/03/2017 ESMA22-106-140 SMSG advice on the Joint ESMA EBA guidelines on the Assessment of the Suitability , SMSG Advice PDF
150.61 KB

SMSG advice on the Joint ESMA EBA guidelines on the Assessment of the Suitability of Members of the Management Body and Key Function Holders

21/01/2020 ESMA22-106-2077 SMSG Advice on Joint Consultation Paper on PRIIPs KID , SMSG Advice PDF
426.62 KB
05/10/2020 ESMA22-106-2819 SMSG advice on 2021 Annual Work Programme , SMSG Advice PDF
117.42 KB
30/06/2015 2015/1006 Final Report on MiFID II-MiFIR draft technical standards on authorisation, passporting, registration of third country firms and cooperation between competent authorities Technical Standards PDF
357.16 KB
28/09/2015 2015-ESMA-1455 Final Report MAR TS Technical Standards PDF
1.77 MB
29/07/2013 JC 2013/01 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards Technical Standards PDF
1.17 MB
21/12/2018 ESMA35-43-1533 ESMA35-43-1533 Binary Options Renewal Decision Notice Decision PDF
83.04 KB
enenenenfrenelenethrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv
23/12/2014 JC/2014/092 Draft RTS on risk concentration and intra-group financial transactions under Financial Conglomerates Directive Technical Standards PDF
819.76 KB
23/03/2020 ESMA22-328-275 Decision of the Management Board- Rules of Procedure , Decision PDF
144.92 KB
10/03/2011 2011/MB/4 Decision of the Management Board- Professional secrecy , Decision PDF
34.68 KB
10/03/2011 2011/MB/3 Decision of the Management Board- Internal language arrangements , Decision PDF
18.51 KB
10/03/2011 ESMA41-140-155 Decision of the Management Board- Code of good administrative behaviour , Decision PDF
179.82 KB
31/05/2011 2011/MB/69 Decision of the Management Board- Access to documents , Decision PDF
201.73 KB
19/12/2011 2011/BS/229 Decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority establishing its Review Panel , , Decision PDF
35.86 KB
This decision establishes the Review Panel of ESMA and sets out its mandate.
14/08/2015 BOA/2015/001 Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) , Decision PDF
147.78 KB
30/04/2018 BoA 2018-01 Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA , Decision PDF
392.62 KB
02/12/2014 2014/BOA/05 Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl , Decision PDF
229.85 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg.  The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint.