ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
26
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Speeches X Corporate Information X Press Releases X Board of Appeal X Technical Advice X Decision X Summary of Conclusions X Opinion X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
29/03/2021 Decision BoA D 2021 02 Board of Appeal of the ESAs- decision on "A" vs ESMA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
283 KB
15/01/2021 BoA D 2021 01 Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howeverton vs EBA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
540.91 KB
11/01/2021 BoA D 2020 03 ESAs BoA Decision on Scope Ratings v ESMA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
437.6 KB
04/11/2020 BoA D 2020 02 Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs EIOPA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
85.83 KB
12/10/2020 BoA D 2020 01 Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs ESMA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
616.54 KB
05/10/2020 ESMA22-106-2788 SMSG Summary of Conclusions 9 July 2020 Corporate Information, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group Summary of Conclusions PDF
158.28 KB
28/07/2020 ESMA22-105-1208 ESMA Opinion on 2018 Discharge Report of EP Corporate Information Opinion PDF
92.69 KB
23/03/2020 ESMA22-328-275 Decision of the Management Board- Rules of Procedure Corporate Information, Management Board Decision PDF
144.92 KB
08/10/2019 boa-2019-d-05_decision BOA decision creditreform_rating_ag_vs_eba Board of Appeal Decision PDF
922.78 KB
27/02/2019 BoA D 2019 01, 02, 03 and 04 Appeal by Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Swedbank A and Nordea Bank Abp against the European Securities and Markets Authority Board of Appeal Decision PDF
829.04 KB
30/11/2018 boa30.18 BoA Decision SEB appeal 30 November 2018 Board of Appeal Decision PDF
416.77 KB
26/09/2018 BoA D 2018 02 Decision in an Appeal by B. against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority Board of Appeal Decision PDF
382.53 KB
30/04/2018 BoA 2018-01 Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA Board of Appeal, Joint Committee Decision PDF
392.62 KB
20/07/2017 BoA 2017 01 FinancialCraft Analytics Sp. z o.o. vs ESMA BoA Decision Board of Appeal, Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
693 KB
21/07/2016 2016/1131 BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 Credit Rating Agencies, Press Releases Decision PDF
108.21 KB
26/01/2016 BOA 2016 001 BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) Board of Appeal Decision PDF
196.32 KB
14/08/2015 BOA/2015/001 Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
147.78 KB
02/12/2014 2014/BOA/05 Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
229.85 KB		 The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg.  The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint.
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
368.94 KB		 The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
361.96 KB		 Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.

Pages