ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (100) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (73) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (47) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Market Integrity (39) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Fund Management (36) Apply Fund Management filter
- Short Selling (35) Apply Short Selling filter
- Supervisory convergence (32) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Corporate Disclosure (23) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- COVID-19 (14) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (13) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Corporate Information (12) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Prospectus (12) Apply Prospectus filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (11) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Sustainable finance (10) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Securitisation (9) Apply Securitisation filter
- Benchmarks (8) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Planning reporting budget (8) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- CESR Archive (7) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Market data (7) Apply Market data filter
- Board of Supervisors (6) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Brexit (6) Apply Brexit filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- CCP Directorate (5) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (3) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- IAS Regulation (3) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Press Releases (3) Apply Press Releases filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Management Board (2) Apply Management Board filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Report filter Report
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Reference (233) Apply Reference filter
- Speech (166) Apply Speech filter
- Final Report (117) Apply Final Report filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (100) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Letter (99) Apply Letter filter
- Consultation Paper (98) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Press Release (94) Apply Press Release filter
- Statement (69) Apply Statement filter
- Technical Advice (19) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Compliance table (15) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Standards (11) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Summary of Conclusions (10) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Annual Report (7) Apply Annual Report filter
- Decision (6) Apply Decision filter
- SMSG Advice (3) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- CESR Document (2) Apply CESR Document filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16/08/2011 | 2011/265 | 11th Extract from the EECS's Database of Enforcement Decisions | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 329.49 KB |
||||
10/10/2012 | 2012/656 | 12th Extract from the EECS’s Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 352.16 KB |
||||
29/10/2013 | 2013/1545 | 14th Extract from the EECS' database of enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 355.57 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing extracts from its confidential database of enforcement decisions on financial statements, with the aim of providing issuers and users of financial statements with relevant information on the appropriate application of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). European enforcers monitor and review financial statements published by issuers with securities traded on a regulated market who prepare their financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and consider whether they comply with IFRS and other applicable reporting requirements, including relevant national law. Publication of enforcement decisions will inform market participants about which accounting treatments European national enforcers may consider as complying with IFRS; that is, whether the treatments are considered as being within the accepted range of those permitted by IFRS. Such publication, together with the rationale behind these decisions, will contribute to a consistent application of IFRS in the EEA. |
|||
15/03/2013 | 2013/312 | Regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 151.67 KB |
||||
04/04/2013 | 2013/444 | 13th Extract from the EECS’s Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 512.42 KB |
||||
18/11/2014 | 2014/1373 | 16th Extract from the EECS's Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 315.55 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing extracts from its confidential database of enforcement decisions on financial statements, with the aim of providing issuers and users of financial statements with relevant information on the appropriate application of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).European enforcers monitor and review IFRS financial statements and consider whether they comply with IFRS and other applicable reporting requirements, including relevant national law.Publication of enforcement decisions will inform market participants about which accounting treatments European national enforcers may consider as complying with IFRS; that is, whether the treatments are considered as being within the accepted range of those permitted by IFRS. Such publication, together with the rationale behind these decisions, will contribute to a consistent application of IFRS in the EEA.Decisions included in this extract were taken by national enforcers in the period from August 2012 to March 2014. ESMA will continue publishing further extracts from the database on a regular basis, with the next extract expected to be published in the first half of 2015. |
|||
18/12/2014 | 2014/1378 | Opinion- Investment-based crowdfunding | Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 460.92 KB |
Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors. It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return. ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement. Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in this document. | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. | |||
09/04/2014 | 2014/377 | 15th Extract from the EECS’s Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 501 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing extracts from its confidential database of enforcement decisions on financial statements, with the aim of providing issuers and users of financial statements with relevant information on the appropriate application of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).European enforcers monitor and review IFRS financial statements and consider whether they comply with IFRS and other applicable reporting requirements, including relevant national law. Publication of enforcement decisions will inform market participants about which accounting treatments European national enforcers may consider as complying with IFRS; that is, whether the treatments are considered as being within the accepted range of those permitted by IFRS. Such publication, together with the rationale behind these decisions, will contribute to a consistent application of IFRS in the EEA. Decisions included in this extract were taken by national enforcers in the period from December 2012 to November 2013. ESMA publishes extracts from the database twice a year. |
|||
28/05/2014 | 2014/576 | Voting Procedures for CCP colleges under EMIR | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 94.15 KB |
||||
01/07/2015 | 2015/1005 | Questions and Answers: Investment-based crowdfunding: money laundering/terrorist financing | Innovation and Products | Q&A | PDF 157.73 KB |
||||
21/07/2015 | 2015/1135 | 17th Extract from the EECS’s Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 466.55 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing extracts from its confidential database of enforcement decisions on financial statements, with the aim of providing issuers and users of financial statements with relevant information on the appropriate application of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).European enforcers monitor and review IFRS financial statements and consider whether they comply with IFRS and other applicable reporting requirements, including relevant national law.Publication of enforcement decisions will inform market participants about which accounting treatments European national enforcers may consider as complying with IFRS; that is, whether the treatments are considered as being within the accepted range of those permitted by IFRS. Such publication, together with the rationale behind these decisions, will contribute to a consistent application of IFRS in the EEA.The decisions included in this extract were taken by national enforcers in the period from February 2013 to November 2014. ESMA will continue publishing further extracts from the database on a regular basis, with the next extract expected to be published in the second half of 2015. | |||
25/09/2015 | 2015/1462 | ESMA opinion on accounting for Deposit Guarantee Scheme | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Opinion | PDF 127.91 KB |
||||
25/11/2015 | 2015/1776 | 18th Extract from the EECS's Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 405.97 KB |
||||
29/01/2015 | 2015/223 | Opinion on draft RTS on the Clearing Obligation | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 601.97 KB |
Legal Basis According to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the class of OTC derivatives that should be subject to the clearing obligation, the date or dates from which the clearing obligation takes effect, including any phase in and the categories of counterparties to which the obligation applies, and the minimum remaining maturity of the OTC derivative contracts referred to in Article 4(1)(b)(ii) of EMIR. Background and Procedure On 1 October 2014, ESMA submitted a draft regulatory technical standard (RTS) on the clearing obligation to the European Commission pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation No (EU) 1095/2010 (the ESMA Regulation) and Article 5(2) of EMIR. This draft RTS covered Interest Rate Swaps. On 18 December 2014, the Commission informed ESMA of its intention to endorse with amendments this draft RTS and submitted to ESMA a modified version of the RTS (the “modified RTS”) introducing, among others, (1) amendments to the date on which the frontloading obligation starts to apply and (2) a new provision on the treatment of non-EU intragroup transactions. Pursuant to Article 10(1) of the ESMA Regulation, this notification from the Commission opens a period of six weeks during which ESMA may amend its draft RTS on the clearing obligation on the basis of the Commission’s proposed amendments and resubmit it to the Commission in the form of a formal opinion. ESMA has to send a copy of its formal opinion to the European Parliament and to the Council. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation the Board of Supervisors has to adopt a formal opinion. Executive Summary ESMA agrees with the ultimate objectives of the modifications that the European Commission intends to introduce. However, ESMA considers that the tool proposed by the Commission for the matter related to the non-EU intra group transactions is not appropriate from a legal perspective and, in the case that the Commission intention is to define a later application date for those transactions, ESMA stands ready to explore, in coordination with the Commission, a different manner to incorporate that provision. ESMA backs the modifications on the frontloading section, though has a few observations and improvements with respect to several recitals. ESMA proposes to incorporate the suggestion of the Commission to deal with the application of the 8 billion threshold to investment funds for the definitions of types of counterparties as a specific provision in the text of the RTS. |
|||
09/03/2015 | 2015/511 | Revised opinion on draft RTS on the clearing obligation on interest rate swaps | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 336.52 KB |
||||
21/05/2015 | 2015/838 | ESMA's opinion on the composition of CCP colleges under EMIR | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 131.98 KB |
||||
07/07/2016 | 2016/1073 | Opinion on the exemption for Swedish pension scheme | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 203.12 KB |
||||
13/07/2016 | 2016/1130 | Final Report on the Market Abuse Regulation Guidelines | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Report | PDF 852.59 KB |
||||
28/07/2016 | 2016/1208 | 19th Extract from the EECS’s Database of Enforcement | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Report | PDF 488.18 KB |