ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
94
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Guidelines and Technical standards filter Guidelines and Technical standards
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Management Board filter Management Board
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- Post Trading (38) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (29) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (24) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (22) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Joint Committee (19) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Board of Appeal (18) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Board of Supervisors (16) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Short Selling (13) Apply Short Selling filter
- Corporate Disclosure (12) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Supervisory convergence (11) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Market Integrity (10) Apply Market Integrity filter
- CESR Archive (8) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (8) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Prospectus (8) Apply Prospectus filter
- Market Abuse (7) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Trade Repositories (7) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Innovation and Products (4) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Benchmarks (3) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (3) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Securitisation (3) Apply Securitisation filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Technical Standards filter Technical Standards
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Guidelines & Recommendations (564) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (106) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (102) Apply Reference filter
- Summary of Conclusions (48) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Final Report (45) Apply Final Report filter
- Letter (38) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (38) Apply Statement filter
- Report (36) Apply Report filter
- Consultation Paper (35) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Annual Report (10) Apply Annual Report filter
- Speech (8) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (3) Apply Opinion filter
Your filters
Credit Rating Agencies X IFRS Supervisory Convergence X Guidelines and Technical standards X Management Board X Compliance table X Technical Standards X Q&A X Technical Advice X Decision X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/06/2010 | 10-333 | Technical Advice- The Equivalence between the Japanese Regulatory and Supervisory Framework and the EU Regulatory Regime for Credit Rating Agencies | CESR Archive, Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 4.59 MB |
||||
10/03/2011 | 2011/MB/3 | Decision of the Management Board- Internal language arrangements | Management Board, Corporate Information | Decision | PDF 18.51 KB |
||||
10/03/2011 | 2011/MB/4 | Decision of the Management Board- Professional secrecy | Management Board, Corporate Information | Decision | PDF 34.68 KB |
||||
10/03/2011 | ESMA41-140-155 | Decision of the Management Board- Code of good administrative behaviour | Corporate Information, Management Board | Decision | PDF 179.82 KB |
||||
17/05/2011 | 2011/144 | Final advice- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 1.72 MB |
||||
31/05/2011 | 2011/MB/69 | Decision of the Management Board- Access to documents | Management Board, Corporate Information | Decision | PDF 201.73 KB |
||||
22/12/2011 | 2011/461 | Final report- Regulatory Technical Standards on the presentation of the information that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Standards | PDF 555.25 KB |
||||
22/12/2011 | 2011/462 | Final Report- Draft RTS on the assessment of compliance of credit rating methodologies with CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Standards | PDF 445.83 KB |
||||
22/12/2011 | 2011/463 | Final report- Regulatory technical standards on the information for registration and certification of credit rating agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Standards | PDF 444.79 KB |
||||
22/12/2011 | 2011/464 | Final report- Draft RTS on the content and format of ratings data periodic reporting to be requested from credit ratings agencies for the purpose of on-going supervision by ESMA | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Standards | PDF 485.78 KB |
||||
18/04/2012 | 2012/259 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence- US, Canada and Australia | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 697.78 KB |
On 12 June 2009 the European Commission requested CESR, now ESMA, to provide its technical advice on the equivalence between the legal and supervisory framework of Japan, The United States, and Canada with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. (Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies ). On 17 November 2009, the Commission also requested CESR to provide its technical advice on Australia. On 28 September 2010, the European Commission published an equivalence decision on Japan. With regard to the compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA had already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: - On 22 December 2011, Japan and Australia; - On 15 March 2012, US, Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore. This report sets out ESMA’s advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the US (Part I), Canada (Part II) and Australia (Part III) respective legal and supervisory frameworks and the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. | |||
31/05/2013 | 2013/626 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence on Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 840.48 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has provided advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies and the respective legal and supervisory frameworks of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is in response to the European Commission’s request for technical advice from ESMA on the equivalence of these jurisdictions legal and supervisory frameworks with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies as set out in Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies. The European Commission has already published equivalence decisions on US, Canada and Australia, on 9 October 2012, and on Japan, 28 October 2010. Regarding compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA has already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: 15 March 2012, Hong Kong and Singapore; 18 April 2012, Argentina and Mexico; 27 April 2012, Brazil. | |||
21/11/2013 | 2013/1703 | Technical Advice on the feasibility of a network of small and medium-sized CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 601.05 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has finalised its Technical Advice to the European Commission on the feasibility of a network of small and medium sized credit rating agencies in order to increase competition in the market. The technical advice provides quantitative and qualitative information on small and medium-sized CRAs in the EU, based on the analysis of the periodic reporting obligations of CRAs to ESMA via the central repository CEREP. It also covers some information regarding possible barriers to entry for companies that wish to conduct rating activity in the EU. Contents The main findings of the advice are: • The 22 registered CRAs are established in 11 EU Member States; • None of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover the whole range of the five rating classes considered (corporates (non-financial), financials, insurance, sovereign and public finance, and structured finance). Whilst DBRS and BCRA cover four and three classes respectively, all the remaining small and medium-sized CRAs cover one or two rating classes only. This contrasts with Fitch, Moody’s and S&P that issue ratings for all five possible rating classes; • Small and medium-sized CRAs are mainly active in issuing corporate ratings. Within this rating type, four small and medium-sized CRAs issue a relatively high number of corporate ratings (CERVED and ICAP) or financial and insurance ratings (GBB and AM Best); • Only 6 of the small and medium-sized CRAs provide sovereign ratings (BCRA, Capital Intelligence, DBRS, European Rating, Feri Euro Rating (Feri) and Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR)), whilst only one (DBRS) issues structured finance ratings; • As of end 2012 the majority of small and medium-sized CRAs issued solicited ratings only, whilst eight issued unsolicited ratings only. Three small and medium-sized CRAs (DBRS, JCR, and Scope) issued both solicited and unsolicited ratings, as was the case also for Fitch, Moody’s and S&P; • As regards geographical coverage of the small and medium-sized CRAs 6 out of 19 (AM Best, Capital Intelligence, Creditreform, DBRS, JCR and Scope) have a coverage that goes beyond one Member State when referring to corporate ratings. As regards the sovereign ratings type, three of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover more than one Member State (Capital Intelligence, Feri and JCR). In both of these ratings types, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P’s rating activities cover all Member States of the EU; • In 2013, 96% of the supervisory fees were paid by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, while their turnover from rating and ancillary services was equal to 88% of the total turnover of the 20 registered and certified CRAs in 2012: and • As of July 2013, 14 out of 19 small and medium-sized CRAs have been granted at least one of the regulatory exemptions provided for in the CRA Regulation. Finally, and with reference to the current situation in the segment of small and medium-sized CRAs, ESMA is not aware of any private networks of small and medium-sized CRAs currently in place. | |||
19/12/2013 | 2013/1953 | Technical Advice to the European Commission on the equivalence between the Argentinean regulatory and supervisory framework and the EU regulatory regime for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 143.15 KB |
||||
24/04/2014 | 2013/922 | Compliance table- suitability guidelines | MiFID - Investor Protection, Guidelines and Technical standards | Compliance table | PDF 74.33 KB |
||||
24/04/2014 | 2013/923 | Compliance table- compliance guidelines | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection | Compliance table | PDF 100.87 KB |
||||
03/06/2014 | 2014/544 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 49.36 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies The Board of Supervisors (“Board”), Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“Treaty”) Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (“ESMA Regulation”), and in particular Article 43(2) and Article 44(1) thereof Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (“CRA Regulation”), in particular Articles 6(2), 23e, 24, 25 thereof Having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 946/2012 of 12 July 2012 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules of procedure on fines imposed to credit rating agencies by the European Securities and Markets Authority, including rules on the right of defence and temporal provisions (“Procedural Regulation”), in particular Article 3(4) thereof Whereas: (1) On the basis of the file containing the investigating officer’s findings and after examination of the submissions of Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited the Board finds that the registered credit rating agencies Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited have committed the infringements listed in paragraphs 12 and 18 of Annex III.I of the CRA Regulation. (2) The Board considers that the evidence before it does not allow it to establish that Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited acted intentionally or negligently as required by Article 36a(1) of the CRA Regulation in order for the Board to impose a fine. (3) The Board thus decides to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Article 24 of the CRA Regulation. Has adopted this decision: Article 1 The Board of Supervisors finds that the registered credit rating agencies Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited have committed the infringements listed in paragraphs 12 and 18 of Annex III.I of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies. Article 2 The Board of Supervisors takes the decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of the following public notice, in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies. | |||
24/06/2014 | 2014/685 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the CRA3 Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Standards | PDF 2.39 MB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its Final Report on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) required under the Credit Rating Agencies (CRA3) Regulation regarding information on transparency of structured finance instruments, the European Rating Platform and periodic reporting of fees charged by credit rating agencies. The draft RTS, which complement the existing regulatory framework for credit rating agencies (CRAs), cover: • disclosure requirements on structured finance instruments (SFIs); • the European Rating Platform (ERP); and • the periodic reporting on fees charged by CRAs. | |||
02/07/2014 | 2014/MB/38 | Decision on the Financial Regulation of ESMA | Management Board | Decision | PDF 392.78 KB |
||||
02/07/2014 | 2014/MB/39 | Decision on the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation of ESMA | Management Board | Decision | PDF 279.01 KB |