ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
35
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Short Selling filter Short Selling
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- Guidelines and Technical standards (31) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Board of Appeal (16) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (12) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Fund Management (10) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (9) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Board of Supervisors (8) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Corporate Information (6) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Post Trading (6) Apply Post Trading filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Market Abuse (3) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (3) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Corporate Disclosure (2) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Supervisory convergence (2) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Benchmarks (1) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Trade Repositories (1) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- Guidelines & Recommendations (132) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (108) Apply Press Release filter
- Letter (105) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (86) Apply Reference filter
- Final Report (61) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (56) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Statement (46) Apply Statement filter
- Report (37) Apply Report filter
- Opinion (35) Apply Opinion filter
- Technical Advice (14) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Speech (8) Apply Speech filter
- Technical Standards (8) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (7) Apply Annual Report filter
- Q&A (4) Apply Q&A filter
- SMSG Advice (2) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
Your filters
Credit Rating Agencies X Joint Committee X IAS Regulation X Short Selling X IFRS Supervisory Convergence X Compliance table X Decision X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
03/06/2014 | 2014/544 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 49.36 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies The Board of Supervisors (“Board”), Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“Treaty”) Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (“ESMA Regulation”), and in particular Article 43(2) and Article 44(1) thereof Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (“CRA Regulation”), in particular Articles 6(2), 23e, 24, 25 thereof Having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 946/2012 of 12 July 2012 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules of procedure on fines imposed to credit rating agencies by the European Securities and Markets Authority, including rules on the right of defence and temporal provisions (“Procedural Regulation”), in particular Article 3(4) thereof Whereas: (1) On the basis of the file containing the investigating officer’s findings and after examination of the submissions of Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited the Board finds that the registered credit rating agencies Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited have committed the infringements listed in paragraphs 12 and 18 of Annex III.I of the CRA Regulation. (2) The Board considers that the evidence before it does not allow it to establish that Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited acted intentionally or negligently as required by Article 36a(1) of the CRA Regulation in order for the Board to impose a fine. (3) The Board thus decides to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice in accordance with Article 24 of the CRA Regulation. Has adopted this decision: Article 1 The Board of Supervisors finds that the registered credit rating agencies Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited have committed the infringements listed in paragraphs 12 and 18 of Annex III.I of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies. Article 2 The Board of Supervisors takes the decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of the following public notice, in accordance with Articles 23e(5) and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies. | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
18/02/2015 | JC/GL/2014/43 Appendix 1 | Compliance table for JC guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee | Compliance table | PDF 186.54 KB |
The table contains details of the competent authorities* who comply or intend to comply with the ESAs’ Joint Guidelines on complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors. |
|||
29/06/2015 | 2015/1048 | Public Notice- ESMA fines DBRS Ratings Limited | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 186.47 KB |
||||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
22/12/2015 | JC/2015/087 | Compliance Table GL financial conglomerates | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee | Compliance table | PDF 291.93 KB |
||||
21/07/2016 | 2016/1131 | BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 | Credit Rating Agencies, Press Releases | Decision | PDF 108.21 KB |
||||
01/06/2017 | ESMA41-137-1005 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt a supervisory measure and impose fines with respect to infringements by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH and Moody’s Investors Service Limited | Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 207.16 KB |
||||
20/07/2017 | BoA 2017 01 | FinancialCraft Analytics Sp. z o.o. vs ESMA BoA Decision | Board of Appeal, Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 693 KB |
||||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
23/07/2018 | ESMA41-137-1153 | BoS decision- CRA 2-2017- SEB | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 706.81 KB |
||||
23/07/2018 | ESMA41-137-1152 | BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Swedbank | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 715.12 KB |
||||
23/07/2018 | ESMA41-137-1150 | BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Nordea | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 714.78 KB |
||||
23/07/2018 | ESMA41-137-1147 | BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Svenska Handelsbanken AB | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 690.73 KB |
||||
23/07/2018 | ESMA41-137-1145 | BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Danske | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 635.85 KB |
||||
06/11/2018 | ESMA35-43-1215 | Compliance table for Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee, MiFID - Investor Protection | Compliance table | PDF 293.08 KB |
||||
28/03/2019 | ESMA41-356-22 | Public notice Fitch Group | Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 227.33 KB |