ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (122) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- CESR Archive (86) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (85) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Corporate Information (81) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Board of Supervisors (58) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Fund Management (57) Apply Fund Management filter
- Management Board (43) Apply Management Board filter
- Planning reporting budget (42) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (41) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- International cooperation (40) Apply International cooperation filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (38) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (38) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Joint Committee (36) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Corporate Disclosure (35) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Securitisation (28) Apply Securitisation filter
- European Single Electronic Format (21) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Innovation and Products (20) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Supervisory convergence (19) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Market Abuse (18) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Market Integrity (17) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Procurement (15) Apply Procurement filter
- Trading (15) Apply Trading filter
- Corporate Finance (14) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Benchmarks (13) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Careers (12) Apply Careers filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (12) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Sustainable finance (11) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Transparency (11) Apply Transparency filter
- Prospectus (10) Apply Prospectus filter
- Short Selling (10) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trade Repositories (9) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- CCP Directorate (7) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (6) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Brexit (4) Apply Brexit filter
- ITMG (4) Apply ITMG filter
- Press Releases (4) Apply Press Releases filter
- Board of Appeal (3) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Speeches (3) Apply Speeches filter
- Vacancies (3) Apply Vacancies filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- IAS Regulation (2) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (2) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- COVID-19 (1) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Reference filter Reference
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- Press Release (101) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (92) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (80) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (62) Apply Report filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (51) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Statement (38) Apply Statement filter
- Letter (35) Apply Letter filter
- Technical Advice (26) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Opinion (18) Apply Opinion filter
- Decision (17) Apply Decision filter
- Speech (16) Apply Speech filter
- Technical Standards (13) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (8) Apply Annual Report filter
- Q&A (8) Apply Q&A filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19/07/2012 | 2011/454 | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and ASIC | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 4 MB |
This document contains two copies of the MOU, signed by ESMA and by the ASIC. | |||
19/07/2012 | 2012/124 | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and MAS | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 574.14 KB |
||||
19/07/2012 | MOU SFC ESMA | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and SFC Hong Kong | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 497.63 KB |
||||
19/07/2012 | MOU SEC ESMA | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and SEC | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 306.87 KB |
||||
19/07/2012 | MOU CNV ESMA | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and CNV Argentina | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 169.13 KB |
||||
19/07/2012 | MOU Canada ESMA | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and Canadian authorities | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 139.68 KB |
||||
11/01/2013 | EBA/REC/2013/01 | EBA Recommendations on supervisory oversight of activities related to banks’ participation in the Euribor panel | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 207.84 KB |
||||
23/01/2013 | 2013/87 | 2013 CRA supervision and policy work plan | Credit Rating Agencies | Reference | PDF 114.95 KB |
||||
18/02/2013 | MOU ESMA/DFSA | MOU on the supervision of CRAs- ESMA and Dubai FSA | Credit Rating Agencies, International cooperation | Reference | PDF 181.09 KB |
||||
24/05/2013 | request for technical advice | Request from the European Commission for ESMA’s technical advice on procedural rules for taking supervisory measures and imposing fines on trade repositories | Post Trading | Reference | PDF 626.54 KB |
||||
07/11/2013 | MARKT/G2/PSDM/bh (2013) 3663122 | EC letter to ESMA on reporting of ETDs | Post Trading | Reference | PDF 430.71 KB |
||||
16/12/2013 | 2013/1933 | CRAs’ Market share calculation according to Article 8d of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Reference | PDF 181.17 KB |
||||
28/02/2014 | 2014/205 | Call for expressions of interest: Group of Economic Advisers for ESMA’s Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 158.95 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking to appoint new members to its Group of Economic Advisors (GEA) for the Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis (CEMA). This follows the expiry of the term of the current GEA. CEMA has established the GEA in order to benefit from the expertise of stakeholders specialised in the topics of financial stability and general economic research related to financial markets. CEMA looks to this group to provide it with advice regarding our work related to financial stability and economic background analysis for the regulatory and supervisory tasks of ESMA. The closing date for application is 25 April 2014. Application form | |||
01/04/2014 | 2014/336 | Trade Repository Supervision Work Plan 2014 | Post Trading | Reference | PDF 111.34 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing a summary of its 2014 supervisory work plan in relation to trade repositories (TRs) with the aim of enhancing the transparency of its actions regarding TRs in the European Union. TRs centrally collect and maintain the records of derivative trades and play a central role in enhancing the transparency of derivative markets and reducing risks to financial stability. In November 2013, ESMA registered six TRs. The obligation for counterparties to report their derivative trades to registered TRs began on 12 February 2014. Under Titles VI and VII of Regulation EU 648/2012 (EMIR), the direct supervision of TRs has been entrusted to ESMA, who has started to supervise the six registered TRs. Supervision of TRs by ESMA is crucial to ensuring that TRs comply on an on-going basis with all EMIR requirements, thereby enabling regulators to access data and details of derivative contracts in order for them to fulfil their respective mandates. |
|||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/2 | ESMA Working Paper- The systemic dimension of hedge fund illiquidity and prime brokerage | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 839.63 KB |
We analyse the potentially vulnerable and systemically relevant financial intermediation chain established by hedge funds and prime brokers. Our dataset covers the 306 largest global hedge funds and their prime brokers over the period July 2001 to December 2011. The study illustrates that hedge funds and prime brokers act as complementary trading partners in normal times. However, we observe that this form of financial intermediation may be severely impaired in times of market distress. This can be explained by the hoarding of liquid securities by prime brokers who are eager to avert runs by their clients. | |||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Monitoring the European CDS market through networks: Implications for contagion risks | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 1005.17 KB |
Based on a unique data set referencing exposures on single name credit default swaps (CDS) on European reference entities, we study the structure and the topology of the European CDS market and its evolution from 2008 to 2012, resorting to network analysis. The structural features revealed show bilateral CDS exposures describing growing scale-free networks whose highly interconnected hubs constitute both a strength and weakness for the stability of the system. The potential “super spreaders” of financial contagion, identified as the most interconnected participants, consist mostly of banks. For some of them net notional exposures may be particularly large relative to their total common equity. Our findings also point to the importance of some non-dealer/non-bank participants belonging to the shadow banking system. | |||
07/11/2014 | ODRG 7/11/14 | Report of the OTC Derivatives Regulators Group (ODRG) to G20 Leaders on Cross-Border Implementation Issues | Post Trading | Reference | PDF 460.72 KB |
||||
19/12/2014 | EC 18/12/2014 annex | Letter from European Commission- Annex with Amended draft RTS on clearing obligation for IRS | Post Trading | Reference | PDF 74.34 KB |
||||
22/12/2014 | 2014/1583 | Credit Rating Agencies’ 2014 market share calculations for the purposes of Article 8d of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Reference | PDF 330 KB |
One of the objectives of the CRA Regulation is to increase competition in the markets for credit ratings by encouraging issuers to use smaller credit rating agencies. To this end, Article 8d(1) of the CRA Regulation states that where issuers or related third parties intend to appoint at least two CRAs to rate an issuance or entity, they shall consider appointing at least one CRA with no more than 10% of the total market share. They will consider this where the issuer or related third party finds that such a CRA is capable of rating the relevant issuance or entity and there is such a CRA available to rate the issuance or entity in question. Where it is not possible to appoint at least one CRA with no more than 10% of the total market share, the issuer or related third party shall document this. The obligations in Article 8d are supervised and enforced at national level by sectoral competent authorities. To help issuers and related third parties carry out this evaluation, Article 8d(2) of the CRA Regulation requires ESMA to publish a list of CRAs registered in the European Union (EU) on its website every year, indicating their total market share and the types of credit ratings issued. | |||
15/01/2015 | ESMA/WP/2015/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Real-world and risk-neutral probabilities in the regulation on the transparency of structured products | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 480.24 KB |
The price of derivatives (and hence of structured products) can be calculated as the discounted value of expected future payoffs, assuming standard hypotheses on frictionless and complete markets and on the type of stochastic processes for the price of the underlying. However, the probabilities used in the pricing process do not represent “real” probabilities of future events, because they are based on the assumption that market participants are risk-neutral. This paper reviews the relevant mathematical finance literature, and clarifies that the risk-neutrality hypothesis is acceptable for pricing, but not to forecast the future value of an asset. Therefore, we argue that regulatory initiatives that mandate intermediaries to give retail investors information on the probability that, at a future date, the value of a derivative will be higher or lower than a given threshold (so-called “probability scenarios”) should explicitly reference probabilities that take into account the risk premium (so-called “real-world” probabilities). We also argue that, though probability scenarios may look appealing to foster investor protection, their practical implementation, if based on the right economic approach, raises significant regulatory and enforcement problems. |