ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
54
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove CESR Archive filter CESR Archive
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- (-) Remove Warnings and publications for investors filter Warnings and publications for investors
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (94) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (68) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Post Trading (40) Apply Post Trading filter
- Short Selling (37) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (35) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Supervisory convergence (13) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- COVID-19 (12) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Corporate Disclosure (11) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Joint Committee (10) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Market Abuse (10) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Brexit (6) Apply Brexit filter
- Innovation and Products (6) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securitisation (6) Apply Securitisation filter
- Corporate Information (4) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Benchmarks (3) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Sustainable finance (3) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (2) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (1) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (1) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- Press Release (367) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (338) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (271) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Reference (247) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (154) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Letter (122) Apply Letter filter
- CESR Document (112) Apply CESR Document filter
- Investor Warning (92) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Speech (55) Apply Speech filter
- Statement (49) Apply Statement filter
- Report (38) Apply Report filter
- Decision (27) Apply Decision filter
- Annual Report (23) Apply Annual Report filter
- Compliance table (17) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Standards (12) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CLOSED Procedure (7) Apply CLOSED Procedure filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Your filters
CESR Archive X Trade Repositories X Warnings and publications for investors X Fund Management X Credit Rating Agencies X Prospectus X Transparency X Opinion X Technical Advice X Q&A X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/06/2005 | 05-365 | MAD AMPs- Frequently Asked Questions | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 55.99 KB |
||||
29/05/2007 | 07-320 | Q&A on Best Execution | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 578.51 KB |
||||
03/11/2009 | 09-559 | Questions and Answers- MiFID complex and non complex financial instruments for the purposes of the Directive’s appropriateness requirements | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 405.18 KB |
||||
08/03/2010 | 10-222 | FAQ regarding the EU Regulation Credit Rating Agencies: Common positions agreed by CESR Members | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 327.78 KB |
||||
19/04/2010 | 10-293 | Question and Answers- Understanding the definition of advice under MiFID | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 335.78 KB |
||||
06/05/2010 | 10-591 | Questions and answers on MiFID: Common positions agreed by CESR Members in the area of the Secondary Markets Standing Committee | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 130.84 KB |
||||
04/06/2010 | 10-521 | FAQ regarding the EU regulation on Credit Rating Agencies: Common positions agreed by CESR Members | CESR Archive | Q&A | PDF 206.24 KB |
||||
09/06/2010 | 10-333 | Technical Advice- The Equivalence between the Japanese Regulatory and Supervisory Framework and the EU Regulatory Regime for Credit Rating Agencies | CESR Archive, Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 4.59 MB |
||||
17/05/2011 | 2011/144 | Final advice- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 1.72 MB |
||||
04/10/2011 | 2011/323 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 797.56 KB |
||||
13/10/2011 | 2011/342 | Opinion- Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the UCITS IV Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 41.33 KB |
||||
16/11/2011 | 2011/379 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 3.51 MB |
||||
21/02/2012 | 2012/113 | Questions and Answers- A Common Definition of European Money Market Funds- updated February 2012 | Fund Management | Q&A | PDF 83.79 KB |
The purpose of this document is to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of the guidelines on a Common Definition of European Money Market Funds developed by CESR by providing responses to questions posed by the general public and competent authorities. The content of this document is aimed at competent authorities to ensure that in their supervisory activities their actions are converging along the lines of the responses adopted by ESMA. However, the answers are also intended to help management companies by providing clarity as to the content of CESR’s guidelines on a Common Definition of European Money Market Funds, rather than creating an extra layer of requirements. | |||
01/03/2012 | 2012/137 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.32 MB |
ESMA publishes today the second part of its final advice (ESMA/2012/137) on possible delegated acts for the Prospectus Directive (PD). The advice was submitted to the Commission on 29 February 2012. In its advice, ESMA proposes how to use a prospectus in a retail cascade and provides input on how to review the provisions of the Prospectus Regulation concerning tax information, indices, auditor’s report on profit forecasts and estimates and audited historical financial information. Today’s advice follows a public consultation started on 13 December 2011. Overall, the technical advice aims to achieve a high level of investor protection and to increase across Europe the legal clarity and efficiency of the prospectus regime. Investment prospectuses as such are aimed to provide investors with easily accessible information on financial products so as to foster in-formed decision-making. | |||
18/04/2012 | 2012/259 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence- US, Canada and Australia | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 697.78 KB |
On 12 June 2009 the European Commission requested CESR, now ESMA, to provide its technical advice on the equivalence between the legal and supervisory framework of Japan, The United States, and Canada with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. (Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies ). On 17 November 2009, the Commission also requested CESR to provide its technical advice on Australia. On 28 September 2010, the European Commission published an equivalence decision on Japan. With regard to the compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA had already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: - On 22 December 2011, Japan and Australia; - On 15 March 2012, US, Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore. This report sets out ESMA’s advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the US (Part I), Canada (Part II) and Australia (Part III) respective legal and supervisory frameworks and the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. | |||
20/11/2012 | 2012/721 | Opinion on Article 50(2)(a) of the UCITS Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 81.31 KB |
||||
09/01/2013 | 2012/864 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/317 | Framework for the assessment of third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Opinion | PDF 725.59 KB |
||||
31/05/2013 | 2013/626 | Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence on Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 840.48 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has provided advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies and the respective legal and supervisory frameworks of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is in response to the European Commission’s request for technical advice from ESMA on the equivalence of these jurisdictions legal and supervisory frameworks with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies as set out in Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies. The European Commission has already published equivalence decisions on US, Canada and Australia, on 9 October 2012, and on Japan, 28 October 2010. Regarding compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA has already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: 15 March 2012, Hong Kong and Singapore; 18 April 2012, Argentina and Mexico; 27 April 2012, Brazil. | |||
01/08/2013 | 2013/1072 | Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 93.1 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published an Opinion on arrangements for the late imposition of the AIFMD. The scope of the opinion is confined to the provision of collective portfolio management services. Arrangements before implementation of the Directive in all Member States Notification of marketing of EU AIFs when the host MS of the AIFM has not transposed the Directive (Articles 31 and 32 of the Directive) ESMA believes that, if the Directive has been transposed in the home MS of the AIFM, the competent authority of the host MS of the AIFM (Article 32) or home MS of the AIFM (Article 31) may not refuse a valid notification under the Directive on the ground that the Directive has not yet been transposed in the host MS. This applies irrespective of whether the marketing is done using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch. Management passport (Article 33 of the Directive) ESMA believes that AIFMs established in a MS that has transposed the Directive should be able to manage an EU AIF via the management passport, both using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch, in a MS where the Directive has not been transposed, irrespective of the provisions currently in place in such jurisdiction since the relevant provisions of the Directive are of a self-executing nature, and provided the AIFM is authorised to manage that type of AIF in accordance with Article 33(1) of the AIFMD. Any local restrictions on AIFMs that are not in accordance with the AIFMD will need to be disapplied. |