ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
62
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Secondary Markets X Joint Committee X Careers X Brexit X Transparency X Market Abuse X Trade Repositories X Post Trading X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X CESR Archive X Sustainable finance X Management Board X Annual Report X SMSG Advice X Decision X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
15/11/2000 Fesco/99-127 1999-2000 Report on the activities of FESCO Annual Report PDF
378.9 KB
15/06/2020 ESMA20-95-1264 2019 Annual Report , , , Annual Report PDF
3.03 MB
16/06/2021 ESMA20-95-1381 2020 Annual Report , , , Annual Report PDF
4 MB
15/06/2020 ESMA20-95-1132 2020 Annual Work Programme- revised , , , Annual Report PDF
548.42 KB
24/02/2021 ESMA70-156-3926 Annual Report 2020 Non-equity Waivers and Deferrals Annual Report PDF
2.44 MB
15/11/2018 ESMA70-145-1081 Annual report on administrative and criminal sanctions and other administrative measures under MAR , Annual Report PDF
158.47 KB
23/11/2021 ESMA70-156-4673 Annual Report on MAR administrative and criminal sanctions 2021 Annual Report PDF
338.34 KB
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
242.72 KB
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
368.94 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA , Decision PDF
361.96 KB
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
18/11/2009 09-782 CESR 2009 Half-Yearly Report Annual Report PDF
925.93 KB
26/10/2010 10-1027 CESR 2010 Half-Yearly Report Annual Report PDF
902.07 KB
01/01/2003 2001-2002 CESR Annual Report for 2001-2002 Annual Report PDF
12.39 MB
03/03/2004 03-396 CESR Annual Report for 2003 Annual Report PDF
1.54 MB
CESR presents its Annual Report for 2003 to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Ecofin Council. The Annual Report provides a thorough overview of the work of CESR and sets out our work plan for 2004. The report includes an explanation of the institutional framework within which CESR works and comments on the market trends of 2003. It also includes a chapter on each working group established within CESR and outlines the key points and progress made under each area. Looking to 2004, the annual report sets out the main priorities and indicates when various projects identified are expected to take place.
07/04/2005 05-013 CESR Annual Report for 2004 Annual Report PDF
2.62 MB
The Annual report was submitted to the European Commission and to the President of the European Parliament and the ECOFIN Council in accordance with the Article 4 of the European Commission
26/06/2006 06-004 CESR Annual Report for 2005 Annual Report PDF
2.08 MB
28/09/2007 07-003 CESR Annual Report for 2006 Annual Report PDF
2.88 MB
25/07/2008 08-103 CESR Annual Report for 2007 Annual Report PDF
4.89 MB
27/07/2009 09-744 CESR Annual Report for 2008 Annual Report PDF
3.8 MB
18/06/2010 10-766 CESR Annual Report for 2009 Annual Report PDF
4.59 MB

Pages