ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove European Single Electronic Format filter European Single Electronic Format
- CESR Archive (280) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (32) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (30) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (27) Apply Fund Management filter
- Corporate Disclosure (26) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (25) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Supervisory convergence (23) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- CCP Directorate (18) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (14) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (11) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market data (10) Apply Market data filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Innovation and Products (6) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Short Selling (6) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trading (6) Apply Trading filter
- Securitisation (5) Apply Securitisation filter
- Sustainable finance (5) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Trade Repositories (4) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Press Releases (2) Apply Press Releases filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Corporate Information (1) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Transparency (1) Apply Transparency filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Reference (332) Apply Reference filter
- Consultation Paper (140) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Opinion (118) Apply Opinion filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (115) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (109) Apply Press Release filter
- Letter (93) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (75) Apply Statement filter
- Report (68) Apply Report filter
- Speech (39) Apply Speech filter
- Compliance table (23) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (23) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Standards (19) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (11) Apply Annual Report filter
- Summary of Conclusions (11) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Decision (9) Apply Decision filter
- CESR Document (4) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (4) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Vacancy (4) Apply Vacancy filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/09/2000 | 00-064c | The regulation of Alternative Trading Systems in Europe. A paper for the EU Commission | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Final Report | PDF 84.28 KB |
Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) offer electronic securities trading facilities outside the traditional trading channels. An expert group chaired by Howard Davies, Chairman of the UK FSA, has studied the impact of such systems in depth. The group has prepared a comprehensive report identifying and assessing the benefits and risks associated with the emergence of ATS and analysing the current regulatory treatment of such systems, within Europe and elsewhere. The report proposes both a short term and a long term option for a harmonised regulatory treatment of such systems in Europe.The paper was submitted to the European Commission as FESCO"s contribution to the preparation of the forthcoming Green Paper on possible amendments to the Investment Services Directive. The Green Paper will shortly be published as a basis for consultation with Member States, the financial services industry and other interested parties. However, the FESCO paper noted that, while the Green Paper on the ISD might be the catalyst for a far-reaching review of the regulatory approach to ATS, it would not provide a short-term solution. Accordingly, FESCO proposed that the short-term solution should take the form of a set of additional regulatory requirements for ATS operating as investment firms.FESCO will be working on proposals for what those additional regulatory requirements might be over the next six months, with a view to producing a consultation paper in the first half of 2001. This consultation paper will provide an opportunity for interested parties to comment in detail on the FESCO proposals. If, however, in the meantime interested parties have any specific comments on the possible additional regulatory requirements identified in paragraph 71 of the September paper, they should make these known to the Secretariat of FESCO via the following e-mail address: fdankers@europefesco.org | |||
11/05/2005 | 05-274 | Feedback Statement- Market Abuse Directive, Level 3 – first set of guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 79.76 KB |
http://www.cesr-eu.org/data/document/05_274.pdf | |||
22/11/2007 | 07-693 | Report on Administrative Measures and Sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 3.44 MB |
||||
28/02/2008 | 08-099 | CESR Executive summary to the report on administrative measures and sanctions as well as the criminal sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 874.1 KB |
||||
28/03/2011 | 2011/22 | Report- ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- July 2010 to December 2010 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 134.79 KB |
||||
04/10/2011 | 2011/323 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 797.56 KB |
||||
01/03/2012 | 2012/137 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.32 MB |
ESMA publishes today the second part of its final advice (ESMA/2012/137) on possible delegated acts for the Prospectus Directive (PD). The advice was submitted to the Commission on 29 February 2012. In its advice, ESMA proposes how to use a prospectus in a retail cascade and provides input on how to review the provisions of the Prospectus Regulation concerning tax information, indices, auditor’s report on profit forecasts and estimates and audited historical financial information. Today’s advice follows a public consultation started on 13 December 2011. Overall, the technical advice aims to achieve a high level of investor protection and to increase across Europe the legal clarity and efficiency of the prospectus regime. Investment prospectuses as such are aimed to provide investors with easily accessible information on financial products so as to foster in-formed decision-making. | |||
11/04/2012 | JC/2011/96 | EBA, ESMA and EIOPA’s Report on the legal, regulatory and supervisory implementation across EU Member States in relation to the Beneficial Owners Customer Due Diligence requirements under the Third Money Laundering Directive [2005/60/EC] | Joint Committee | Final Report | PDF 552.11 KB |
||||
11/04/2012 | JC/2011/97 | EBA, ESMA and EIOPA’s Report on the legal and regulatory provisions and supervisory expectations across EU Member States of Simplified Due Diligence requirements where the customers are credit and financial institutions under the Third Money Laundering Di | Joint Committee | Final Report | PDF 476.47 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/602 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2011 to December 2011 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 573.49 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/603 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2012 to June 2012 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 431.12 KB |
NOTE: This Report is an amended version of the Report published on 25 September 2012. The previously published Report was amended on 15 May 2013 following the discovery of factual errors in the statis-tical information in Section III.2. Title ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported - January 2012 to June 2012 | |||
27/09/2012 | 2012/600 Annex VIII | Impact assessment- Annex VIII of the Final report on draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Regulation (EU) 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories | Post Trading | Final Report | PDF 2.32 MB |
||||
07/12/2012 | JC/2012/86 | ESA report on the application of AML/CTF obligations to, and the AML/CTF supervision of e-money issuers, agents and distributors in Europe. | Joint Committee | Final Report | PDF 476.42 KB |
||||
03/01/2013 | 2012/874 | Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the budgetary implications of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) | Post Trading | Final Report | PDF 526.73 KB |
||||
09/01/2013 | 2012/864 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
04/04/2013 | 2013/302 | ESMA’s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.08 MB |
On 14 January 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating a Regulation on fees for Trade Repositories (TRs) by a delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the proposed fee structures for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs. Respondents to this consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant data to support their arguments or proposals.Given the time period established for providing this advice, ESMA was compelled to require responses to the consultation within a short timeframe. In total, ESMA received 8 responses to the consultation. Non-confidential responses can be found on ESMA’s website. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input given the short period ESMA was able to consult for. This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the fee structure for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs in the EU and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on fees for TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered how best to adjust the original proposals. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission as they work on the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on fees for TRs. |
|||
12/04/2013 | JC 2013-010 | Joint Committee report on risks and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system, March 2013 | Joint Committee | Final Report | PDF 694.8 KB |
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (Joint Committee) has published today its first Report on Risks and Vulnerabilities in the European Union’s (EU) Financial System. The European financial system faces a range of risks and challenges: 1. Risks from the weak macroeconomic outlook for the financial health of real-economy and sovereign borrowers, and consequently for financial institutions’ asset quality and profitability; 2. Risks of a prolonged period of low interest rates impacting insurers and pension funds, increasing search for yield behaviour and facilitating widespread forbearance by banks; 3. Risks of further fragmentation of the single market in financial services due to evidences of national retrenchment, home bias, reduced cross-border activity and clustering of markets; 4. Risks from increased reliance on collateral in financial transactions; 5. Risks to confidence in financial institutions balance sheet valuations and risk disclosures; and 6. Risks of loss of confidence in financial market benchmarks. These risks, although presented individually in this report, are highly interlinked and require a concerted response by policy makers both at the political level and from the European System of Financial Supervision including the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). Suggested policy actions to restore the confidence in the financial system are presented at the end of some described risks. The challenge facing policy makers is nothing less than to restore the confidence and trust in the financial system that has been eroded during recent years’ financial crises. | |||
10/06/2013 | 2013/619 | Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 596.91 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive. This is the first report of its kind and provides a comparison of liability regimes covering the EEA – comprising the 27 EU Member States along with Iceland and Norway and is aimed at providing clarity for market participants about the different regimes in place. The report contains an overview of the different arrangements and frameworks in place in EEA States to address administrative, criminal, civil and governmental liability, and provides clarity to market participants about the different regimes in place. The report was compiled in response to a European Commission request of January 2011 for assistance in identifying and monitoring the different regimes in EEA states. The report does not cover how the regimes, or sanctions, are applied. Report Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Annex III Individual responses from EEA States | |||
14/06/2013 | 2013/741 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported—January 2012 to December 2012 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 457.11 KB |
The report compiles statistical data regarding the number of prospectuses approved and passported by National Competent Authorities in the period from January 2012 to December 2012 (with a quarterly disclosure). | |||
01/07/2013 | 2013/805 | Supervisory Practices under MAD- Peer review report and Good Practices | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.17 MB |
ESMA's peer review of the supervisory practices EEA national competent authorities (NCAs) covers how national authorities enforce the requirements of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD). The Directive deals with the prevention of the dissemination of misleading information, the breach of reporting obligations and market abuse. |