ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
34
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove CESR Archive filter CESR Archive
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- Corporate Information (82) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (23) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Appeal (16) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Management Board (14) Apply Management Board filter
- Board of Supervisors (12) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Market Integrity (7) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Planning reporting budget (7) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Short Selling (7) Apply Short Selling filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (5) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (3) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Trade Repositories (2) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Market Abuse (1) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Securitisation (1) Apply Securitisation filter
- Supervisory convergence (1) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- Final Report (390) Apply Final Report filter
- Press Release (359) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (321) Apply Reference filter
- Consultation Paper (289) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Letter (158) Apply Letter filter
- CESR Document (110) Apply CESR Document filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (94) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (94) Apply Opinion filter
- Report (66) Apply Report filter
- Speech (60) Apply Speech filter
- Statement (57) Apply Statement filter
- Q&A (21) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Advice (21) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (17) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Compliance table (15) Apply Compliance table filter
- CLOSED Procedure (7) Apply CLOSED Procedure filter
- SMSG Advice (2) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
Your filters
MiFID - Secondary Markets X Audit X Post Trading X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X CESR Archive X Joint Committee X Benchmarks X Annual Report X Decision X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15/11/2000 | Fesco/99-127 | 1999-2000 Report on the activities of FESCO | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 378.9 KB |
||||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
18/11/2009 | 09-782 | CESR 2009 Half-Yearly Report | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 925.93 KB |
||||
26/10/2010 | 10-1027 | CESR 2010 Half-Yearly Report | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 902.07 KB |
||||
01/01/2003 | 2001-2002 | CESR Annual Report for 2001-2002 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 12.39 MB |
||||
03/03/2004 | 03-396 | CESR Annual Report for 2003 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 1.54 MB |
CESR presents its Annual Report for 2003 to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Ecofin Council. The Annual Report provides a thorough overview of the work of CESR and sets out our work plan for 2004. The report includes an explanation of the institutional framework within which CESR works and comments on the market trends of 2003. It also includes a chapter on each working group established within CESR and outlines the key points and progress made under each area. Looking to 2004, the annual report sets out the main priorities and indicates when various projects identified are expected to take place. | |||
07/04/2005 | 05-013 | CESR Annual Report for 2004 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 2.62 MB |
The Annual report was submitted to the European Commission and to the President of the European Parliament and the ECOFIN Council in accordance with the Article 4 of the European Commission | |||
26/06/2006 | 06-004 | CESR Annual Report for 2005 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 2.08 MB |
||||
28/09/2007 | 07-003 | CESR Annual Report for 2006 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 2.88 MB |
||||
25/07/2008 | 08-103 | CESR Annual Report for 2007 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 4.89 MB |
||||
27/07/2009 | 09-744 | CESR Annual Report for 2008 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 3.8 MB |
||||
18/06/2010 | 10-766 | CESR Annual Report for 2009 | CESR Archive | Annual Report | PDF 4.59 MB |
||||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
11/10/2018 | ESMA70-155-5775 | Delegation third country TV post trade transparency | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 219.76 KB |
||||
06/11/2020 | ESMA70-155-11210 | Delegation third country TV post trade transparency | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 124.97 KB |
||||
11/10/2018 | ESMA70-155-5905 | Delegation_from_the_BoardofSupervisors_opinions on third country TV_PositionLimits | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 222.28 KB |