ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Press Releases filter Press Releases
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Short Selling filter Short Selling
- (-) Remove IAS Regulation filter IAS Regulation
- Brexit (31) Apply Brexit filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (25) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Fund Management (21) Apply Fund Management filter
- Board of Supervisors (20) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Corporate Information (19) Apply Corporate Information filter
- COVID-19 (18) Apply COVID-19 filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (17) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Joint Committee (15) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Market Integrity (15) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Innovation and Products (11) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- CESR Archive (7) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (7) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Prospectus (7) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (7) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- CCP Directorate (6) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Trade Repositories (6) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (5) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Sustainable finance (5) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (5) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Corporate Governance (4) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Speeches (4) Apply Speeches filter
- Management Board (3) Apply Management Board filter
- Market Abuse (3) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Trading (3) Apply Trading filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Market data (2) Apply Market data filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Securitisation (2) Apply Securitisation filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (1) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- International cooperation (1) Apply International cooperation filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (1) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Transparency (1) Apply Transparency filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Statement filter Statement
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Press Release (364) Apply Press Release filter
- Letter (286) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (283) Apply Reference filter
- Opinion (144) Apply Opinion filter
- Consultation Paper (139) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Final Report (123) Apply Final Report filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (96) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Report (66) Apply Report filter
- Speech (44) Apply Speech filter
- Decision (33) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Standards (24) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Q&A (20) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (18) Apply Compliance table filter
- Annual Report (10) Apply Annual Report filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/02/2019 | ESMA 70-155-7026 | Use of UK data in ESMA databases in case of a no-deal Brexit | Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC | Statement | PDF 281.69 KB |
||||
07/10/2019 | ESMA70-155-7658 | Use of UK data in ESMA databases and performance of MiFID II calculations in case of a no-deal Brexit on 31 October 2019 | Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC | Statement | PDF 155.54 KB |
||||
13/04/2021 | ESMA74-362-1934 | Updated LEI statement SFTR | Market data, Post Trading, Securities Financing Transactions | Statement | PDF 128.32 KB |
||||
07/10/2019 | ESMA90-1-167 | Update on the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union- preparations for a possible no-deal Brexit scenario on 31 October 2019 | Benchmarks, Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC | Statement | PDF 179.84 KB |
||||
20/12/2012 | 2012/853 | Treatment of Forbearance Practices in IFRS Financial Statements of Financial Institutions | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Statement | PDF 220.43 KB |
||||
05/12/2019 | JC 2019 19 | The introduction of fallbacks in OTC derivative contracts and the requirement to exchange collateral | Joint Committee, Post Trading | Statement | PDF 80.41 KB |
||||
09/06/2010 | 10-333 | Technical Advice- The Equivalence between the Japanese Regulatory and Supervisory Framework and the EU Regulatory Regime for Credit Rating Agencies | CESR Archive, Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 4.59 MB |
||||
01/04/2020 | ESMA70-156-2287 | Technical Advice to the European Commission on weekly position reports under MiFID II | MiFID - Secondary Markets, Supervisory convergence | Technical Advice | PDF 231.84 KB |
||||
19/12/2013 | 2013/1953 | Technical Advice to the European Commission on the equivalence between the Argentinean regulatory and supervisory framework and the EU regulatory regime for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 143.15 KB |
||||
24/01/2014 | 2013/1965 | Technical Advice to the Commission on procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 385.87 KB |
Reasons for publication On 29 of April 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to trade repositories (TRs) by delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs. Respondents to the consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant information in support of their arguments or proposals. ESMA published the consultation on 18 October 2013. The market participants could provide their comments until 15 November 2013. In total ESMA received two responses to the consultation. The respondents have required confidential treatment for their input. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input. Contents This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered them carefully. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission towards the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs. |
|||
19/12/2014 | 2014/1569 | Technical Advice to the Commission on MiFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Advice | PDF 2.8 MB |
Reasons for publication The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) received a formal request (mandate) from the European Commission (Commission) on 23 April 2014 to provide technical advice to assist the Commission on the possible content of the delegated acts required by several provisions of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). The mandate focuses on technical issues which follow from MiFID II and MiFIR and is available on the European Commission website (here). ESMA was required to provide technical advice by no later than six months after the entry into force of MiFID II and MiFIR (2 July 2014). Contents This final report follows the same structure as the Consultation Paper (CP) published by ESMA on 22 May 2014 which is: (1) Introduction, (2) Investor protection, (3) Transparency, (4) Data publication, (5) Micro-structural issues, (6) Requirements applying on and to trading venues, (7) Commodity derivatives and (8) Portfolio compression. This paper also contains summaries of responses to the CP received by ESMA. The rationale of those items covered already in the CP for which no relevant changes have been introduced, is not developed again in this Final Report. ESMA recommends, therefore, to read this report together with the CP published on 22 May 2014 to have a complete vision of the rationale for ESMA’s technical advice. Next steps Delegated acts should be adopted by the Commission so that they enter into application by 30 months following the entry into force of the Directive and Regulation, taking into account the right of the European Parliament and Council to object to a delegated act within 3 months (which can be extended by a further 3 months). | |||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1157 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – US | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 5.06 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1162 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Switzerland | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.65 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1161 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Singapore | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.55 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1158 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Japan | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.76 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1160 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Hong Kong | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.57 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1159 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Australia | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.82 MB |
||||
21/11/2013 | 2013/1703 | Technical Advice on the feasibility of a network of small and medium-sized CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 601.05 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has finalised its Technical Advice to the European Commission on the feasibility of a network of small and medium sized credit rating agencies in order to increase competition in the market. The technical advice provides quantitative and qualitative information on small and medium-sized CRAs in the EU, based on the analysis of the periodic reporting obligations of CRAs to ESMA via the central repository CEREP. It also covers some information regarding possible barriers to entry for companies that wish to conduct rating activity in the EU. Contents The main findings of the advice are: • The 22 registered CRAs are established in 11 EU Member States; • None of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover the whole range of the five rating classes considered (corporates (non-financial), financials, insurance, sovereign and public finance, and structured finance). Whilst DBRS and BCRA cover four and three classes respectively, all the remaining small and medium-sized CRAs cover one or two rating classes only. This contrasts with Fitch, Moody’s and S&P that issue ratings for all five possible rating classes; • Small and medium-sized CRAs are mainly active in issuing corporate ratings. Within this rating type, four small and medium-sized CRAs issue a relatively high number of corporate ratings (CERVED and ICAP) or financial and insurance ratings (GBB and AM Best); • Only 6 of the small and medium-sized CRAs provide sovereign ratings (BCRA, Capital Intelligence, DBRS, European Rating, Feri Euro Rating (Feri) and Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR)), whilst only one (DBRS) issues structured finance ratings; • As of end 2012 the majority of small and medium-sized CRAs issued solicited ratings only, whilst eight issued unsolicited ratings only. Three small and medium-sized CRAs (DBRS, JCR, and Scope) issued both solicited and unsolicited ratings, as was the case also for Fitch, Moody’s and S&P; • As regards geographical coverage of the small and medium-sized CRAs 6 out of 19 (AM Best, Capital Intelligence, Creditreform, DBRS, JCR and Scope) have a coverage that goes beyond one Member State when referring to corporate ratings. As regards the sovereign ratings type, three of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover more than one Member State (Capital Intelligence, Feri and JCR). In both of these ratings types, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P’s rating activities cover all Member States of the EU; • In 2013, 96% of the supervisory fees were paid by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, while their turnover from rating and ancillary services was equal to 88% of the total turnover of the 20 registered and certified CRAs in 2012: and • As of July 2013, 14 out of 19 small and medium-sized CRAs have been granted at least one of the regulatory exemptions provided for in the CRA Regulation. Finally, and with reference to the current situation in the segment of small and medium-sized CRAs, ESMA is not aware of any private networks of small and medium-sized CRAs currently in place. | |||
18/07/2019 | ESMA33-9-321 | Technical Advice on Sustainability Considerations in the Credit Rating Market | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 451.01 KB |
||||
02/10/2015 | 2015/1471 | Technical Advice on Reducing Sole and Mechanistic Reliance on Credit Ratings | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 1.1 MB |