REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|19/12/2016||2016/1673||2016-1673 Q&A on MiFID II commodity derivatives topics||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Q&A||PDF
|31/03/2016||2016/408||Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR
DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU.
In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’).
Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates.
|12/07/2021||ESMA41-356-187||Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository||Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|11/10/2018||ESMA70-155-5775||Delegation third country TV post trade transparency||Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Decision||PDF
|06/11/2020||ESMA70-155-11210||Delegation third country TV post trade transparency||Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Decision||PDF
|11/10/2018||ESMA70-155-5905||Delegation_from_the_BoardofSupervisors_opinions on third country TV_PositionLimits||Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Decision||PDF
|06/04/2021||ESMA70-872942901-38||esma70-872942901-38_qas_on_mifid_ii_and_mifir_market_structures_topics||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Q&A||PDF
|03/02/2015||2015/224||ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Market Abuse Regulation||Market Abuse||Technical Advice||PDF
|This advice:• specifies the MAR market manipulation indicators, by providing examples of practices that may constitute market manipulation as well as proposing “additional” indicators of market manipulation; • recommends to set the minimum thresholds that exempt certain market participants in the emission allowance market from publicly disclosing inside information at six million tonnes of CO2eq per year and at 2,430 MW rated thermal input;• suggests the way to determine to which regulator delays in disclosure of inside information needs to be notified. • provides clarifications on the enhanced disclosure of managers’ transactions. - ESMA recommends disclosing any acquisition, disposal, subscription or exchange of financial instruments of the relevant issuer or related financial instruments carried out by managers,, further illustrated through a non-exhaustive list of types of transactions subject to this obligation. . ESMA also clarifies the transactions that can be allowed by the issuer during a closed period when normally managers are prohibited to trade; and• proposes procedures and arrangements to ensure sound whistleblowing infrastructures – i.e. EU national regulators should allow the receipt of reports of infringements, including appropriate communication channels and guarantee the protection of reporting and reported persons, with respect to their identity and their personal data. Next steps ESMA has sent its technical advice to the European Commission for its consideration in drafting its implementing standards regarding MAR. ESMA’s regulatory technical standards regarding MAR will be delivered in July 2015.|
|10/04/2019||JC 2019 25||Joint ESA advice on the costs and benefits of developing a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures||Innovation and Products, Joint Committee||Technical Advice||PDF
|10/04/2019||JC 2019 26||Joint ESA advice on the need for legislative improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements||Innovation and Products, Joint Committee||Technical Advice||PDF
|20/03/2020||ESMA70-155-3832||List of trading venues benefiting from a transitional exemption from the access provisions under Article 36(5) of MiFIR||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Decision||PDF
|14/12/2017||ESMA70-151-957||MiFID II Q&A on post-trading issues||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Post Trading||Q&A||PDF
|01/04/2016||2016/419||Q&A Market Abuse Directive||Market Abuse||Q&A||PDF
|28/05/2021||ESMA70-1861941480-52||Q&A on EMIR implementation||Post Trading, Trade Repositories||Q&A||PDF
|27/03/2019||ESMA70-872942901-36||Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR commodity derivatives topics||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Q&A||PDF
|29/05/2020||ESMA70-872942901-35||Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Q&A||PDF
|20/07/2021||ESMA70-1861941480-56||Q&A on MiFIR data reporting||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|11/04/2019||ESMA31-62-780||Q&A on Prospectus Related Topics||Brexit, Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Finance, Corporate Governance, Corporate Information, Prospectus, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|29/07/2021||ESMA70-145-114||Q&A on the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)||Benchmarks, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|06/08/2021||ESMA70-145-111||Q&A on the Market Abuse Regulation||Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Q&A||PDF
The purpose of this document is to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of MAR and its implementing measures. It does this by providing responses to questions posed by the general public and competent authorities in relation to the practical application of the MAR framework
The content of this document is aimed at competent authorities to ensure that in their supervisory activities and their actions are converging along the lines of the responses adopted by ESMA and at helping issuers, investors and other market participants by providing clarity on the content of the market abuse rules, rather than creating an extra layer of requirements.