ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
26
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove European Single Electronic Format filter European Single Electronic Format
- (-) Remove Press Releases filter Press Releases
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (80) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (22) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Appeal (16) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- Board of Supervisors (8) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Post Trading (8) Apply Post Trading filter
- Short Selling (8) Apply Short Selling filter
- Corporate Information (7) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Market Integrity (6) Apply Market Integrity filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Fund Management (4) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (4) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Sustainable finance (2) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Market Abuse (1) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Prospectus (1) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (1) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Trade Repositories (1) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Technical Standards filter Technical Standards
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove SMSG Advice filter SMSG Advice
- Press Release (319) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (209) Apply Reference filter
- Letter (197) Apply Letter filter
- Investor Warning (92) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (85) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (83) Apply Opinion filter
- Statement (79) Apply Statement filter
- Consultation Paper (72) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Final Report (67) Apply Final Report filter
- Report (32) Apply Report filter
- Speech (29) Apply Speech filter
- Q&A (12) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (11) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (7) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Annual Report (5) Apply Annual Report filter
- CESR Document (4) Apply CESR Document filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
Your filters
MiFID - Secondary Markets X Corporate Disclosure X Benchmarks X Warnings and publications for investors X Press Releases X Joint Committee X European Single Electronic Format X Technical Standards X SMSG Advice X Decision X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28/09/2015 | 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I | 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I- draft RTS and ITS on MiFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 2.85 MB |
||||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
21/07/2016 | 2016/1131 | BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 | Credit Rating Agencies, Press Releases | Decision | PDF 108.21 KB |
||||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
11/10/2018 | ESMA70-155-5775 | Delegation third country TV post trade transparency | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 219.76 KB |
||||
06/11/2020 | ESMA70-155-11210 | Delegation third country TV post trade transparency | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 124.97 KB |
||||
11/10/2018 | ESMA70-155-5905 | Delegation_from_the_BoardofSupervisors_opinions on third country TV_PositionLimits | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 222.28 KB |
||||
29/09/2014 | 2014/1187 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Technical Standards | PDF 810.07 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the revised Transparency Directive relating to the notification of major shareholdings. | |||
20/12/2013 | 2013/1970 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Standards | PDF 713.74 KB |
The Final Report contains the draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) on situations which require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus which ESMA is required to submit to the European Commission by 1 January 2014 in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The Report furthermore includes a summary of the main responses received to ESMA’s Consultation Paper which was published in March 2013. The draft RTS sets out nine situations which are always considered to be significant in the context of securities issuance and where a supplement to the prospectus will always be required. Other situations would require a case-by-case assessment. | |||
01/07/2015 | 2015/1014 | Draft RTS on prospectus related issues under the Omnibus II Directive | Corporate Disclosure | Technical Standards | PDF 949.89 KB |
||||
23/12/2014 | JC/2014/092 | Draft RTS on risk concentration and intra-group financial transactions under Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Technical Standards | PDF 819.76 KB |
||||
21/09/2018 | esma70-156-769 | ESMA opinion on MiFID II RTS 1 | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 645.02 KB |
||||
29/07/2013 | JC 2013/01 | Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards | Joint Committee | Technical Standards | PDF 1.17 MB |
||||
28/02/2017 | ESMA70-872942901-21 - annex | Final Draft RTS on packaged orders | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 334.25 KB |
||||
11/12/2019 | ESMA70-156-1535 | Final Report amending ITS on main indices and recognised exchanges under CRR | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 736.79 KB |
||||
19/12/2014 | 2014/1571 | Final Report on draft Implementing Technical Standards on main indices and recognised exchanges under the Capital Requirements Regulation | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 281.16 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has developed draft Implementing Technical Standards specifying main indices and recognised exchanges as required under Paragraph 8 of Article 197 of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation). These have now been submitted to the European Commission submitted for endorsement of the draft ITS.It has 3 months to make this decision. |