ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
106
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X Joint Committee X Supervisory convergence X Trading X ITMG X Securities Financing Transactions X Prospectus X Corporate Information X Technical Standards X SMSG Advice X Compliance table X Final Report X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
26/04/2012 2012/270 Actual use of sanctioning powers under MAD Final Report PDF
1.55 MB
The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010.  The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime.
23/09/2014 2014/1164 Annex Annex to the Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA to the ECON hearing, 23 September 2014 Final Report PDF
503.01 KB
09/03/2016 ESAs/2016/22 Annexes to RTS on Risk Mitigation LegisWrite Final Report PDF
297.23 KB
18/03/2015 2015/592 Automated Trading Guidelines- ESMA peer review among National Competent Authorities Final Report PDF
930.33 KB
25/02/2015 2015/494 Best Execution under MiFID , Final Report PDF
761.62 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain.
10/06/2013 2013/619 Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive , Final Report PDF
596.91 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive.   This is the first report of its kind and provides a comparison of liability regimes covering the EEA – comprising the 27 EU Member States along with Iceland and Norway and is aimed at providing clarity for market participants about the different regimes in place. The report contains an overview of the different arrangements and frameworks in place in  EEA States to address administrative, criminal, civil and governmental liability, and provides clarity to market participants about the different regimes in place. The report was compiled in response to a European Commission request of January 2011 for assistance in identifying and monitoring the different regimes in EEA states.   The report does not cover how the regimes, or sanctions, are applied.    Report Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Annex III Individual responses from EEA States
11/02/2020 ESMA35-43-1076 Compliance table for Guidelines on MiFID II product governance requirements (ESMA35-43-620) , Compliance table PDF
157.54 KB
18/02/2015 JC/GL/2014/43 Appendix 1 Compliance table for JC guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors , Compliance table PDF
187.15 KB

The table contains details of the competent authorities* who comply or intend to comply with the ESAs’ Joint Guidelines on complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors.

06/11/2018 ESMA35-43-1215 Compliance table for Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body , , Compliance table PDF
293.08 KB
22/12/2015 JC/2015/087 Compliance Table GL financial conglomerates , Compliance table PDF
291.93 KB
01/07/2021 ESMA31-62-1409 Compliance table GLs on Risk factors Compliance table PDF
131.48 KB
08/07/2021 ESMA32-382-1157 Compliance table on disclosure requirements under the Prospectus Regulation Compliance table PDF
124.29 KB
20/06/2019 ESMA35-43-1430 Compliance table on Guidelines on MiFID II suitability requirements , Compliance table PDF
145.71 KB
24/04/2014 2013/923 Compliance table- compliance guidelines , Compliance table PDF
100.87 KB
13/09/2021 ESMA35-43-2183 Compliance table- Guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence (ESMA/2015/1886) , Compliance table PDF
160.49 KB
10/03/2020 ESMA35-43-1957 Compliance table- Guidelines on complex debt instruments and structured deposits (ESMA/2015/1787) , Compliance table PDF
166.08 KB
10/03/2020 ESMA35-43-1968 Compliance table- Guidelines on cross-selling practices (ESMA/2016/574) , Compliance table PDF
159.52 KB
10/02/2021 ESMA34-45-1128 Compliance table- Guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs , , Compliance table PDF
226.56 KB
24/04/2014 2013/922 Compliance table- suitability guidelines , Compliance table PDF
74.33 KB
20/12/2013 2013/1970 Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus , Technical Standards PDF
713.74 KB
The Final Report contains the draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) on situations which require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus which ESMA is required to submit to the European Commission by 1 January 2014 in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The Report furthermore includes a summary of the main responses received to ESMA’s Consultation Paper which was published in March 2013. The draft RTS sets out nine situations which are always considered to be significant in the context of securities issuance and where a supplement to the prospectus will always be required. Other situations would require a case-by-case assessment.

Pages