REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|08/03/2011||2011/62||10th Extract from EECS's Database of Enforcement Decisions||IFRS Supervisory Convergence||Final Report||PDF
|28/06/2012||2012/412||Activity Report on IFRS Enforcement in the European Economic Area in 2011||IFRS Supervisory Convergence||Final Report||PDF
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its Activity Report on IFRS Enforcement in the European Economic Area in 2011. The report provides an overview of the monitoring of compliance of financial information with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and enforcement action taken in the European Economic Area (EEA) in 2011. The report is based on the activities of the European Enforcers Coordination Sessions (EECS) and of the accounting enforcers in the EEA (European enforcers). This operates under ESMA's oversight and its main objective is to coordinate the enforcement activities of Member States in order to increase convergence amongst European enforcer's activities which should contribute to fostering investor confidence. Its main functions include coordination of enforcement activities through the exchange of views on particular accounting matters, providing feedback to the International Accounting Standards Board on issues related to the application of the IFRS and work on dedicated projects identified as key priorities. This report: provides an overview of enforcement activities in the EEA and the coordination of enforcement through EECS; presents the outcome and some tentative conclusions relating to the enforcement of IFRS; and provides a summary of EECS engagement with third country accounting enforcers. The report is based on the activities of EECS and the European enforcers during 2011 relating to: Activities undertaken or coordinated at European level; Issues brought to the attention of the standard setter; Ex-ante activities incurred as part of the preparation of the annual review process; Findings in respect of reviews conducted in 2011; Actions taken to improve the quality of future financial reporting; and Decisions and emerging issues discussed during EECS meetings in the year.
|26/04/2012||2012/270||Actual use of sanctioning powers under MAD||Supervisory convergence||Final Report||PDF
|The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010. The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime.|
|18/12/2014||2014/1560||Advice- Investment-based crowdfunding||Innovation and Products||Final Report||PDF
|Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors. It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return. ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement.Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in sections 1 to 6 of this document.|
|18/03/2015||2015/592||Automated Trading Guidelines- ESMA peer review among National Competent Authorities||Supervisory convergence||Final Report||PDF
|25/02/2015||2015/494||Best Execution under MiFID||MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence||Final Report||PDF
|The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain.|
|17/07/2019||ESMA35-43-1905||Call for evidence Impact of the inducements and costs and charges disclosure requirements under MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|30/09/2019||ESMA-35-43-2090||Call for evidence on MiFID II product intervention powers||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|18/01/2018||ESMA35-43-904||Call for Evidence – Potential product intervention measures on contracts for differences and binary options to retail clients||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|14/02/2013||2013/218||Considerations of materiality in financial reporting||Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence||Final Report||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1210||Consulation paper on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper|
|15/07/2019||ESMA35-43-2019||Consultation paper on compliance function guidelines||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|05/10/2016||2016/1436||Consultation Paper on Draft guidelines on MiFID II product governance requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|27/05/2016||2016/723||Consultation Paper on ESMA technical advice on Benchmarks Regulation||Market Integrity, Benchmarks||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/12/2011||2011/446||Consultation paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID compliance function requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|13/07/2017||ESMA35-43-748||Consultation Paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID II suitability requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/12/2011||2011/445||Consultation paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1210||Consultation paper on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/05/2014||2014/549||Consultation Paper on MiFID II/MiFIR||MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Consultation Paper||PDF
|This publication is the first step in the process of translating the MiFID II/MiFIR requirements into practically applicable rules and regulations to address the effects of the financial crisis and to improve financial market transparency and strengthen investor protection.MiFID II/MiFIR introduces changes that will have a large impact on the EU’s financial markets, these include transparency requirements for a broader range of asset classes; the obligation to trade derivatives on-exchange; requirements on algorithmic and high-frequency-trading and new supervisory tools for commodity derivatives. It will also strengthen protection for retail investors through limits on the use of commissions; conditions for the provision of independent investment advice; stricter organisational requirements for product design and distribution; product intervention powers; and the disclosure of costs and charges.Responding to this paperThe European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to the specific questions listed in the ESMA MiFID II/MiFIR Consultation Paper.Please use this “form to reply”.The level 1 texts adopted by the European Council during its 13 May 2014 meeting are available here: MiFID II and MiFIR. These links are coming from the Council Press Release.|
|19/12/2014||2014/1570 Annex B||Consultation paper on MiFID II/MiFIR- Annex B||MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Consultation Paper||PDF
|Who should read this paper?
This document will be of interest to all stakeholders involved in the securities markets. It is primarily of interest to competent authorities and firms that are subject to MiFID II and MiFIR – in particular, investment firms, credit institutions performing investment services and activities, data reporting services providers and trading venues. This paper is also important for trade associations and industry bodies, institutional and retail investors and their advisers, and consumer groups, as well as any market participant because the MiFID II and MiFIR requirements seek to implement enhanced provisions to ensure investor protection and the transparency and orderly running of financial markets with potential impacts for anyone engaged in the dealing with or processing of financial instruments.
Responding to this paper
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to the specific questions listed in the ESMA MiFID II/MiFIR Consultation Paper.
Please note that ESMA will only be able to consider responses received using this “form to reply” and complying with the procedure below.
a) InstructionsPlease note that, in order to facilitate analysis of the large number of responses expected, ESMA will be using an IT tool that does not allow processing of responses which do not follow the formatting indications described below. Therefore, in responding stakeholders should:i. use the published template and send their responses in Word format (pdf documents will not be considered except for annexes); ii. not remove the tags of type