ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
22
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X Audit X Brexit X Corporate Finance X Warnings and publications for investors X Corporate Governance X Prospectus X Joint Committee X Fund Management X Technical Standards X Q&A X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
23/12/2014 JC/2014/092 Draft RTS on risk concentration and intra-group financial transactions under Financial Conglomerates Directive Technical Standards PDF
819.76 KB
29/07/2013 JC 2013/01 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards Technical Standards PDF
1.17 MB
29/03/2021 ESMA35-43-349 Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection topics , Q&A PDF
883 KB
31/03/2017 ESMA35-36-794 Q&A Relating to the provision of CFDs and other speculative products to retail investors under MiFID Q&A PDF
948.76 KB
09/11/2018 ESMA35-36-1262 Technical Q&As on product intervention measures on CFDs and binary options Q&A PDF
147.84 KB
30/03/2021 ESMA34-43-392 Q&A on the application of the UCITS Directive Q&A PDF
552.25 KB
30/03/2021 ESMA34-32-352 Q&A on the Application of the AIFMD , Q&A PDF
531.42 KB
09/11/2020 ESMA31-67-127 Question and answers on Transparency Directive (TD) , , , , Q&A PDF
352.79 KB
11/04/2019 ESMA31-62-780 Q&A on Prospectus Related Topics , , , , , , Q&A PDF
957.9 KB
31/03/2021 ESMA31-62-1258 Q&As on the Prospectus Regulation Q&A PDF
692.72 KB
19/12/2016 2016/JCESA QA Questions and Answers on Big Data Q&A PDF
333.65 KB
31/05/2016 2016/774 Q&A on the Application of the EuSEF and EuVECA Regulations Q&A PDF
212.93 KB
16/12/2016 2016/1669 2016-1669 Q&A on AIFMD Q&A PDF
436.68 KB
21/11/2016 2016/1586 Questions and Answers on UCITS Directive Q&A PDF
454.07 KB
18/09/2015 2015/1409 Draft Implementing Technical Standards on penalties and measures under Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS Directive) Technical Standards PDF
339.52 KB
30/06/2015 2015/1006 Final Report on MiFID II-MiFIR draft technical standards on authorisation, passporting, registration of third country firms and cooperation between competent authorities Technical Standards PDF
357.16 KB
20/02/2014 2014/161 Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuSEF Technical Standards PDF
29.18 KB
20/02/2014 2014/160 Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuVECA Technical Standards PDF
175.99 KB
02/04/2013 2013/413 Final Report- Draft regulatory technical standards on types of AIFMs Technical Standards PDF
116.08 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to determine types of alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs), where relevant in the application of the AIFMD.  The draft RTS distinguish AIFMs managing alternative investment funds (AIF) of the open-ended type and AIFMs managing AIFs of the closed-ended type, in order to apply the rules on liquidity management, the valuation procedures and the transitional provisions of the AIFMD.  ESMA was required to develop these RTS by Article 4(4) of the AIFMD and they are aimed at ensuring uniform conditions of application of the AIFMD across the European Union.
20/12/2013 2013/1970 Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus , Technical Standards PDF
713.74 KB
The Final Report contains the draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) on situations which require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus which ESMA is required to submit to the European Commission by 1 January 2014 in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The Report furthermore includes a summary of the main responses received to ESMA’s Consultation Paper which was published in March 2013. The draft RTS sets out nine situations which are always considered to be significant in the context of securities issuance and where a supplement to the prospectus will always be required. Other situations would require a case-by-case assessment.