REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|17/12/2021||JC 2021 19||Joint Committee Q&As relating to the Securitisation Regulation||Securitisation||Q&A||PDF
|28/01/2022||ESMA74-362-893||QAs on SFTR data reporting||Post Trading, Securities Financing Transactions, Trade Repositories||Q&A||PDF
|03/11/2020||ESMA71-99-1423||QA Fast Track Peer Review- Wirecard||Corporate Disclosure, Guidelines and Technical standards, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|28/02/2022||ESMA70-1861941480-52||Q&A on EMIR implementation||Post Trading, Trade Repositories||Q&A||PDF
|24/03/2022||ESMA41-356-271||Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt supervisory measures and impose fines in respect of infringements committed by REGIS-TR, S.A||Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|23/09/2021||ESMA41-356-233||Decision- UnaVista Limited||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|12/07/2021||ESMA41-356-187||Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository||Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|19/11/2021||ESMA35-43-349||Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection topics||MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|31/01/2019||ESMA35-43-1562||CFD Renewal Decision (2) Notice||MiFID - Investor Protection||Decision||PDF
|21/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1533||ESMA35-43-1533 Binary Options Renewal Decision Notice||MiFID - Investor Protection||Decision||PDF
|31/10/2018||ESMA35-43-1397||CFD Renewal Decision Notice||MiFID - Investor Protection||Decision||PDF
|31/03/2017||ESMA35-36-794||Q&A Relating to the provision of CFDs and other speculative products to retail investors under MiFID||MiFID - Investor Protection||Q&A||PDF
|09/11/2018||ESMA35-36-1262||Technical Q&As on product intervention measures on CFDs and binary options||MiFID - Investor Protection||Q&A||PDF
|19/11/2021||ESMA33-128-563||Questions and answers on the Securitisation Regulation||Securitisation||Q&A||PDF
|31/03/2016||2016/408||Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR
DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU.
In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’).
Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates.
|22/06/2012||2012/382||MiFID Q&A in the area of investor protection and intermediaries||MiFID - Investor Protection||Q&A||PDF