REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|27/03/2014||2014/332||Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements||MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products||Opinion||PDF
|Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products.|
|05/07/2018||ESMA71-99-999||SMSG Renewal July 2018 Press Release||Press Releases, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Press Release||PDF
|28/10/2019||ESMA22-106-1990||SMSG Opinion on ESMA's Report on performance and cost of retail investment products||Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Opinion||PDF
|31/10/2018||ESMA22-106-1296||SMSG Opinion on EC request to ESAs on cost and performance of retail investment, insurance and pension products||Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Opinion||PDF
|18/01/2018||ESMA71-99-930||Product Intervention Call for Evidence PR||MiFID - Investor Protection, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|12/07/2019||ESMA70-156-1065||Press_Release_ESMA launches consultation on cost of market data and consolidated tape||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|07/03/2018||ESMA71-99-953||Press release: ESMA publishes double volume cap data||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|05/04/2017||ESMA71-99-386||Press release: ESMA clarifies market structure issues under MiFID II||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Press Release||PDF
|14/12/2018||ESMA71-99-1074||Press Release- Final Report on tick size regime||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|12/10/2011||2011/339||Press release- ESMA Stakeholder Group elects Guillaume Prache as chair, Judith Hardt and Peter de Proft as vice-chairs||Press Releases, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||Press Release||PDF
|01/04/2015||2015/674||Press release- ESMA launches centralised data projects for MiFIR and EMIR||MiFID - Secondary Markets, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|25/07/2016||2016/1167||Press release- ESMA issues warning on sale of speculative products to retail investors||MiFID - Investor Protection||Press Release||PDF
|20/07/2011||2011/223||Press release- ESMA consults on systems and controls for highly automated trading||Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Press Release||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA71-99-1085||Press release- ESMA consults on measures to promote sustainability in EU capital markets||Credit Rating Agencies, Fund Management, MiFID - Investor Protection||Press Release||PDF
|27/03/2018||ESMA71-98-128||Press release- ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors||MiFID - Investor Protection, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|12/02/2018||ESMA71-99-946||Press release- ESAs warn consumers of risks in buying virtual currencies||MiFID - Investor Protection||Press Release||PDF
|02/05/2018||ESMA71-99-971||Press release on MiFID II bond transparency calculations||MiFID - Secondary Markets||Press Release||PDF
|06/12/2017||ESMA50-164-1173||Press Release MiFID/MAR Transitional Transparency Calculations||Market Abuse, Market Integrity, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC, Press Releases||Press Release||PDF
|02/05/2016||2016/566||Press release MiFID II RTS||Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Press Release||PDF
|22/12/2015||2015/1872||Press Release Cross Selling Guidelines||MiFID - Investor Protection||Press Release||PDF
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its Guidelines on Cross-Selling Practices under MiFID II (guidelines) to ensure investors are treated fairly when an investment firm offers two or more financial products or services as part of a package.
The guidelines include principles on:
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) – EBA, EIOPA and ESMA - initially intended to issue joint guidelines covering all cross-selling practices taking place in the banking, insurance and securities sectors given that cross-selling is often cross-sectoral, and had consulted the stakeholders previously on this basis.
However, in light of legal concerns, the ESAs decided not to issue joint guidelines on cross-selling practices but agreed that ESMA should issue ESMA-only guidelines under MiFID II in order to meet its 3 January 2016 deadline.
While ESMA’s guidelines take into account the results of the ESAs’ joint consultation, the final report focuses on the feedback regarding cross-selling practices under MIFID II. Further, the guidelines are addressed to national regulators supervising the firms which provide MiFID services, when they engage in cross-selling practices.
The ESAs intend to inform the European Commission about the issues encountered and raise the possibility of legislative change to provide a foundation for future joint guidelines.
The guidelines will apply from 3 January 2017.