ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
100
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Board of Appeal X Procurement X Fund Management X Report X Letter X Annual Report X Statement X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
20/01/2011 2011/16 Letter to the SEC- Rulemakings on Registration of non-resident Swap Data Repositories Letter PDF
30.66 KB
16/11/2011 2011/382 Letter to Michel Barnier- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
41.73 KB
16/11/2011 2011/383 Letter to Jonathan Faull- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
41.73 KB
16/11/2011 2011/384 Letter to Sharon Bowles- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
200.77 KB
20/01/2011 2011/4 Letter to the CFTC- Rulemakings on Registration of foreign Swap Data Repositories and Foreign Boards of Trade Letter PDF
34.38 KB
27/07/2012 2012/476 Reply of ESMA to the European Commission’s Green Paper on Shadow Banking Letter PDF
175.94 KB
28/01/2014 2013/1941 Letter to Jonathan Faull (EC) regarding draft technical standards , Letter PDF
44.25 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1232 Letter to the European Commission- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
71.12 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1233 Letter to the European Parliament- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
65.84 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1234 Letter to the European Council- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
64.7 KB
05/10/2015 2015/1498 Letter to European Commission re RTS on indirect clearing under EMIR and under MiFIR , Letter PDF
92.96 KB
17/11/2015 2015/1513 Letter SM to EC- implementation timeline MiFID MiFIR Letter PDF
85.8 KB
30/09/2016 2016/1408 ESMA appoints new chairs to Standing Committees , , , Statement PDF
141.3 KB

The Board of Supervisors of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has appointed the following individuals to serve as chairs of its standing committees:

  • Hannelore Lausch, Executive Director of the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin), Germany, will chair the Market Data Standing Committee;
  • Cyril Roux, Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI, will chair the Investment Management Standing Committee; and
  • Merel van Vroonhoven, Chair of the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM), Netherlands, will chair the Investor Protection and Intermediaries Standing Committee.

The standing committees are expert groups drawn from ESMA staff and the national competent authorities for securities markets regulation in the Member States, and are responsible for the development of policy in their respective areas.  The appointments are for a period of two years and commence with immediate effect.

29/01/2016 2016/163 Opinion on CRR ITS final Letter PDF
105.66 KB
29/01/2016 2016/164 Letter J Hill- Opinion on Draft ITS CRR Letter PDF
23.86 KB
02/02/2016 2016/165 Public Statement- Supervisory work on potential closet index tracking Statement PDF
258.17 KB

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is issuing this statement to inform stakeholders and especially investors about the potential for some European collective investment funds to be ‘closet index trackers’, and to give details on the work that ESMA has been doing in this context.

Introduction

  1. ESMA’s attention was drawn to an alleged practice in the European collective investment management industry whereby asset managers claim, according to their fund rules and investor information documentation, to manage their funds in an active manner while the funds are, in fact, staying very close to a benchmark and therefore implementing an investment strategy which requires less input from the investment manager. At the same time, it is alleged that these funds charge management fees in line with those of funds that are considered to be actively managed[1]. This practice is commonly referred to as ‘closet indexing’ or ‘index hugging’.
  2. In many EU Member States, NCAs have launched or are in the process of launching specific investigations, in addition to their regular monitoring and supervisory functions, to determine the potential extent of closet indexing in their jurisdictions, with a focus on equity funds at this stage. At the same time, the issue has been the subject of considerable attention by investor protection groups and the media throughout the European Union.

Reasons for issuing this statement

  1. The issues around ‘closet indexing’ form part of a broader issue on the effectiveness of investor disclosure and the legitimate expectations of investors in respect of the service provided by some asset managers. Nonetheless, the potential practice of closet indexing in Europe raises questions that merit closer analysis. The analysis carried out by ESMA (see paragraphs 9 to 16 for more details) indicates that there might be a small, but not insignificant number of funds in the EU equity fund sector that may be closet index trackers. If the existence of this practice were to be confirmed by further supervisory scrutiny carried out at national level, this could mean that:
  1. investors could be making investment decisions based on an expectation that they will be provided with a more active fund management service than they receive in practice and, therefore, may be paying higher management fees than that usually envisaged for a passive/not significantly active management service;
  2. investors may be exposed to a different risk/return profile than they expect; and
  3. some asset managers may not provide clear descriptions of how funds are managed in key disclosure documents such as the fund’s Prospectus and Key Investor Information Document (KIID).
  1. ESMA considers it important that fund managers take their commitments in disclosure documents seriously. Managers should expect supervisory consequences where evidence for incorrect disclosures is proven.
 

[1] ESMA recognises that management fees may depend on a number of factors.

16/02/2016 2016/297 Follow-up MMF , Report PDF
882.13 KB
21/03/2016 2016/402 Letter EU Comm Guersent- position limits Letter PDF
96.65 KB
21/03/2016 2016/403 Letter EU Comm Guersent- Ancillary Activity Letter PDF
96.03 KB
21/03/2016 2016/404 Letter EU Comm Guersent- Non-equity transparency Letter PDF
125.94 KB

Pages