ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
126
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Corporate Information X Corporate Disclosure X Benchmarks X Warnings and publications for investors X Transparency X Press Releases X Joint Committee X Prospectus X Technical Standards X Investor Warning X Decision X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
28/09/2015 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I- draft RTS and ITS on MiFID II and MiFIR Technical Standards PDF
2.85 MB
10/09/2012 2012/557 PT A ESMA alerta os investidores para os riscos dos investimentos online Investor Warning PDF
336.1 KB
A ESMA alerta os investidores para os riscos dos investimentos online
07/02/2014 2014/154 LV Ar ieguldījumiem sarežģītos produktos saistītie riski , Investor Warning PDF
435.59 KB
10/09/2012 2012/557 HU Az Európai Értékpapírpiaci Hatóság (ESMA) az online befektetések buktatóira figyelmezteti a lakossági befektetőket Investor Warning PDF
578.5 KB
Az Európai Értékpapírpiaci Hatóság (ESMA) az online befektetések buktatóira figyelmezteti a lakossági befektetőket
07/02/2014 2014/154 HU Az összetett termékekbe történő befektetések kockázatai , Investor Warning PDF
384.08 KB
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
242.72 KB
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
368.94 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA , Decision PDF
361.96 KB
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
21/07/2016 2016/1131 BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 , Decision PDF
108.21 KB
18/04/2013 2013/267 LV Cenu starpības līgumiem (CFD) Investor Warning PDF
456.82 KB
Cenu starpības līgumiem (CFD)
31/01/2019 ESMA35-43-1562 CFD Renewal Decision (2) Notice Decision PDF
103.92 KB
encsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplplptroskslsv
31/10/2018 ESMA35-43-1397 CFD Renewal Decision Notice Decision PDF
101.55 KB
enenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenen
18/04/2013 2013/267 SV CFD-Kontrakt Investor Warning PDF
289.47 KB
CFD-Kontrakt
18/04/2013 2013/267 RO Contracte pentru diferentă (CFD-uri) Investor Warning PDF
347.86 KB
Contracte pentru diferentă (CFD-uri)
28/02/2013 2013/267 Contracts for Difference (CFDs) , Investor Warning PDF
389.45 KB
18/04/2013 2013/267 NL Contracts for difference (CFDs) Investor Warning PDF
441.01 KB
Contracts for difference (CFDs)
18/04/2013 2013/267 PT Contratos diferenciais (CFD) Investor Warning PDF
315.37 KB
Contratos diferenciais (CFD)
18/04/2013 2013/267 ES Contratos por Diferencias (CFD) Investor Warning PDF
270.64 KB
Contratos por Diferencias (CFD)
18/04/2013 2013/267 FR Contrats sur différence (CFD) Investor Warning PDF
386.18 KB
Contrats sur différence (CFD)
18/04/2013 2013/267 IT Contratti per differenza (CFD) Investor Warning PDF
416.5 KB
Contratti per differenza (CFD)

Pages