ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Investor Protection filter MiFID - Investor Protection
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- (-) Remove Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove IAS Regulation filter IAS Regulation
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Trading filter Trading
- Press Releases (296) Apply Press Releases filter
- CESR Archive (250) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (64) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (43) Apply Fund Management filter
- Post Trading (41) Apply Post Trading filter
- Corporate Disclosure (30) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Joint Committee (25) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (24) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Corporate Information (18) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Board of Supervisors (17) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Management Board (15) Apply Management Board filter
- Brexit (14) Apply Brexit filter
- Benchmarks (12) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Innovation and Products (10) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Prospectus (9) Apply Prospectus filter
- Short Selling (9) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trade Repositories (9) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Sustainable finance (6) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (6) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Corporate Governance (5) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Planning reporting budget (5) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- CCP Directorate (4) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- COVID-19 (4) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Securitisation (4) Apply Securitisation filter
- Board of Appeal (3) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (3) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- International cooperation (3) Apply International cooperation filter
- Audit (2) Apply Audit filter
- European Single Electronic Format (2) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Finance (1) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Press Release filter Press Release
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Reference (206) Apply Reference filter
- Opinion (142) Apply Opinion filter
- Letter (127) Apply Letter filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (93) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- SMSG Advice (76) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Consultation Paper (71) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Final Report (69) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (66) Apply Statement filter
- Report (62) Apply Report filter
- Summary of Conclusions (36) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Speech (32) Apply Speech filter
- Investor Warning (26) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Compliance table (19) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (19) Apply Q&A filter
- Decision (12) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Standards (9) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (7) Apply Annual Report filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/05/2005 | 05-331 | Press release- Facilitating the implementation of the Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 72.91 KB |
||||
22/11/2007 | 07-762 | Press release- CESR identifies the Administrative Measures and Sanctions as well as the Criminal Sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) | Market Abuse, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 82.23 KB |
||||
18/01/2011 | 2011/27 | Press release- ESMA finds diversity across Europe in regulators’ contingency measures for financial crisis situations | Press Releases, Supervisory convergence | Press Release | PDF 31.5 KB |
||||
07/07/2011 | 2011/195 | Press release- ESMA investigates how Member States have implemented the Transparency Directive | Press Releases, Supervisory convergence | Press Release | PDF 61.34 KB |
||||
20/07/2011 | 2011/223 | Press release- ESMA consults on systems and controls for highly automated trading | Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Press Release | PDF 57.39 KB |
||||
12/10/2011 | 2011/339 | Press release- ESMA Stakeholder Group elects Guillaume Prache as chair, Judith Hardt and Peter de Proft as vice-chairs | Press Releases, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Press Release | PDF 29.29 KB |
||||
21/10/2011 | 2011/354 | Press release- European enforcers see good level of IFRS application in 2010 | IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 31.97 KB |
||||
02/12/2011 | 2011/414 | Press release- ESMA gathers worldwide supervisors to discuss enforcement of IFRS | IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 28.53 KB |
||||
09/12/2011 | 2011/431 | Global regulators discuss OTC derivatives regulation | Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Press Release | PDF 18.94 KB |
Leaders and senior representatives of the authorities responsible for the regulation of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets in Canada, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and the United Statesmet met yesterday in Paris. | |||
22/12/2011 | 2011/457 | ESMA outlines future automated trading regime for trading platforms, investment firms and competent authorities | Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Press Release | PDF 151.9 KB |
||||
24/02/2012 | 2012/128 | ESMA readies guidelines on automated trading – application deadline starts | Press Releases, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Press Release | PDF 167.16 KB |
ESMA today publishes the official translations of its final “Guidelines on systems and controls in an automated trading environment for trading platforms, investment firms and competent authorities” (ESMA/2011/456), first published on 21 December 2011. High Frequency Trading (HFT) is one form of automated trading. By having translated the guidelines into all the official languages of the EU, today’s publication triggers a transitional period of two months within which national supervisors have to declare whether they intend to comply with the guidelines or otherwise explain the reasons for non-compliance which would be made public by ESMA. According to the ESMA Regulation national supervisors have to make every effort to comply with the Guidelines. | |||
26/04/2012 | 2012/272 | ESMA identifies divergence in Member States’ use of sanctions under the Market Abuse Directive | Press Releases, Supervisory convergence | Press Release | PDF 179.91 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the use of administrative and criminal sanctions by European Union (EU) national regulators under the Market Abuse Directive (MAD). The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010. The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime. | |||
24/05/2012 | 2012/330 | ESMA finds high level of consistency in EU national regulators’ practices for the approval of investment prospectuses | Press Releases, Supervisory convergence | Press Release | PDF 177.71 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published today “Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process“, a peer review report on the application of regulatory good practices by national supervisory authorities - competent authorities (CA) when approving investment prospectuses.The review was conducted using good practice criteria that ESMA developed on selected areas of the Prospectus Directive dealing with the approval process for investment prospectuses. The prospectuses provide investors with easy to understand and relevant information on investment products. Peer review reports on national regulators’ procedures contribute to ESMA’s objective of fostering supervisory convergence and achieving a level playing field between jurisdictions. | |||
06/07/2012 | 2012/424 | ESMA publishes MiFID guidelines to enhance investor protection | MiFID - Investor Protection, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 118.08 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today published two final sets of guidelines aimed at enhancing the protection of investors in the EU. The guidelines relate to the provisions under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) relating to the suitability of investment advice and the compliance function. | |||
26/07/2012 | 2012/483 | ESMA publishes review of accounting treatment of Greek sovereign debt | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Press Release | PDF 122.97 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today published Review of Greek Government Bonds accounting practices in the IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011, which sets out the results of the review conducted by ESMA on accounting practices and disclosures regarding exposure to Greek government bonds. The ESMA review considered a sample of 42 European financial institutions, each with significant exposure to Greek government bonds totalling an estimated gross exposure of around €80 billion. |
|||
17/09/2012 | 2012/581 | ESMA proposes remuneration guidelines for firms providing investment services | MiFID - Investor Protection, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 130.32 KB |
||||
12/11/2012 | 2012/730 | ESMA announces enforcement priorities for 2012 financial statements | IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 164.68 KB |
||||
20/12/2012 | 2012/854 | ESMA issues statement on forbearance practices | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 117.17 KB |
ESMA issues statement on forbearance practicesThe European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued a Public Statement on the Treatment of Forbearance Practices in IFRS Financial Statements of Financial Institutions. The statement deals with the definition of forbearance practices, their impact on the impairment of financial assets and the specific disclosures relating to forbearance activities that listed financial institutions should include in their IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2012.The statement results from ESMA’s concerns that a lack of consistency amongst issuers in this area raises issues over the transparency and accuracy of their financial statements. ESMA believes that the consistent application of IFRS principles promotes comparability among listed financial institutions’ financial statements.This forms part of broader work on forbearance practices undertaken by regulators, including the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), who are examining the issue in the context of prudential reporting and macro-economic risks respectively.Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair said:“ESMA and national authorities have become concerned at the lack of clarity in financial issuers’ financial statements regarding their treatment of forbearance-related practices, and the potential impact this might have on issuer’s financial performance and position, with consequences for investors and markets.“We have seen the impact of an inadequate approach to forbearance and impairment in previous financial crises and our aim is to avoid a similar situation developing here in the EU. We believe that by promoting an appropriate and consistent approach to the definition of forbearance, measurement of impairment and related disclosures, investors can be confident that issuers’ financial statements accurately reflect credit risk exposures and the credit quality of their financial assets.”“A uniformly consistent approach on this issue in the EU will contribute to the proper functioning of financial markets, the maintenance of financial stability in the European Union and improved investor protection.”Forbearance and objective evidence of impairmentForbearance occurs when the borrower is considered to be unable to meet the terms and conditions of the contract due to financial difficulties and ,based on these difficulties, it decides to modify the terms and conditions of the contract to allow the borrower sufficient ability to service the debt or refinance. Therefore, forbearance measures constitute objective evidence of impairment under IFRS.Forbearance and asset impairmentAs forbearance measures are extended due to the financial difficulties of the borrower, ESMA expects that issuers would have when assessing the impairment of those loans:• identified whether a loss event has had an impact on the estimated future cash flows;• based impairment calculations on the estimated future cash flows and not the contractual cash flows; and• applied a heightened level of scepticism when estimating the future cash flows, as well as other parameters used. Required disclosures in the year-end IFRS financial statementsThe disclosures to be provided by financial institutions, regarding their forbearance practices in their annual IFRS financial statements, should include the following qualitative aspects:• details of the types of forbearance practices undertaken during the reporting period;• description of the risks related to the forbearance practices undertaken, and how these risks are managed and monitored for internal management purposes;• accounting policies applied in respect of the forborn assets; and• description of any changes in these aspects from the prior period.The issuers should also provide quantitative disclosures in order to enable users to evaluate the impact of forbearance measures on the credit risk profile of their loan portfolios and their financial position and performance. ESMA expects such quantitative disclosures to be included in the 2012 financial statements as far as possible, and in any event they should be implemented and reflected in 2013’s annual financial statements.Next StepsESMA, together with EU national competent authorities, will continue to monitor the level of transparency that issuers provide in their financial statements on forbearance related measures and their impact on impairment, and will consider whether further action is required. The statement complements ESMA’s common enforcement priorities for the 2012 year-end IFRS financial statements which were published in November 2012. |
|||
28/02/2013 | 2013/266 | ESMA and the EBA warn investors about contracts for difference | MiFID - Investor Protection, Warnings and publications for investors, Press Releases | Press Release | PDF 119.01 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published a warning to retail investors about the dangers of investing in contracts for difference (CFDs).The two authorities are concerned that during the current period of low investment returns, inexperienced retail investors across the EU are being tempted to invest in complex financial products, which they may not fully understand and which can end up costing them money they cannot afford to lose.Andrea Enria and Steven Maijoor, Chairs of the EBA and ESMA, warned:“Retail investors across the EU should be aware of all the risks arising from investing in CFDs. These products appear to promise investors substantial returns at a low cost but may ultimately cost them far more than they may have intended or could afford to lose.“CFDs are complex products that are not suitable for all types of investors, therefore you should always make sure that you understand how the product you are buying works, that it does what you want it to do and that you are in a position to take the loss if it fails.”Investors trading CFDs should protect themselvesInvestors should only consider trading in CFDs if they have extensive experience of trading in volatile markets, if they fully understand how these operate and have sufficient time to manage their investment on an active basis.Investors should carefully read their agreement or contract with the CFD provider before making a trading decision. They should make sure that they at least understand the following: • the costs of trading CFDs with the CFD provider, • whether the CFD provider will disclose the margins it makes on their trades, • how the prices of the CFDs are determined by the CFD provider, • what happens if they hold their position open overnight, • whether the CFD provider can change or re-quote the price once an investor places an order, • whether the CFD provider will execute investor’s orders even if the underlying market is closed, • whether there is an investor or deposit protection scheme in place in the event of counterparty or client asset issues.If investors do not understand what’s on offer, they should not trade. Further information Always check if the CFD provider is authorised to do investment business in your country. You can check this on the website of the CFD provider’s national regulator. A list of all the national regulatory authorities, and their websites, is also available from:• ESMA at http://www.esma.europa.eu/investor-corner; and • EBA at http://www.eba.europa.eu/Publications/Consumer-Protection-Issues.aspx.The investor warning on CFDs will be translated into the official EU languages.Concurrently with the publication of this warning, the EBA is addressing an internal Opinion under Art. 29 of the EBA Regulations to national supervisory authorities on the prudential supervision of CFDs. Notes for editors1. ESMA/2013/267 Investor Warning – Contracts for Difference (CFDs)2. ESMA and the EBA are independent EU Authorities that were established on 1 January 2011 and work closely with the European other European Supervisory Authority responsible for insurance and occupational pensions (EIOPA).3. ESMA’s mission is to enhance the protection of investors and promote stable and well-functioning financial markets in the European Union (EU). As an independent institution, ESMA achieves this aim by building a single rule book for EU financial markets and ensuring its consistent application across the EU. ESMA contributes to the regulation of financial services firms with a pan-European reach, either through direct supervision or through the active co-ordination of national supervisory activity.4. The EBA has a broad remit in the areas of banking, payments and e-money regulation, as well as on issues related to corporate governance, auditing and financial reporting. Its tasks include the protection of consumers and depositors, preventing regulatory arbitrage, guaranteeing a level playing field (especially by building a single rule book for the European banking system) strengthening international supervisory coordination, promoting supervisory convergence and providing advice to EU institutions. Further information:Reemt SeibelESMA Communications Officer Tel: +33 (0)1 58 36 4272Mob: +33 6 42 48 55 29Email: reemt.seibel@esma.europa.eu David CliffeESMA Senior Communications OfficerTel: +33 (0)1 58 36 43 24Mob: +33 6 42 48 29 06Email: david.cliffe@esma.europa.euRomain SadetEBA Communications Officer Tel: +44 (0) 207 997 5914Mob: +44 (0) 7785 463278 Email: romain.sadet@eba.europa.eu Franca CongiuEBA Communications OfficerTel: +44 (0) 207 382 1781Mob: +44 (0) 7771 376395Email: francarosa.congiu@eba.europa.eu | |||
15/04/2013 | ESMA/2013/475 | Press Release ESMA finds divergence in national supervision of money market funds | Supervisory convergence | Press Release | PDF 136.95 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a peer review report examining whether EU securities supervisors correctly apply ESMA’s guidelines on money market funds (MMFs). The review compared supervisory and enforcement practices for MMFs of 30 supervisory authorities across the European Economic Area (EEA). ESMA reviewed those 20 jurisdictions that had transposed the guidelines into their national rules. |