ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove MiFID - Investor Protection filter MiFID - Investor Protection
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Corporate Information filter Corporate Information
- CESR Archive (286) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (50) Apply Post Trading filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (32) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Corporate Disclosure (26) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Joint Committee (26) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Fund Management (23) Apply Fund Management filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (19) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (19) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Prospectus (17) Apply Prospectus filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (14) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (9) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Short Selling (5) Apply Short Selling filter
- CCP Directorate (4) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Securitisation (4) Apply Securitisation filter
- European Single Electronic Format (3) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (3) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Sustainable finance (3) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Trade Repositories (3) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- COVID-19 (1) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Reference (192) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (95) Apply Press Release filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (83) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Annual Report (80) Apply Annual Report filter
- Opinion (69) Apply Opinion filter
- Consultation Paper (48) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Statement (42) Apply Statement filter
- Report (41) Apply Report filter
- Summary of Conclusions (40) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Speech (35) Apply Speech filter
- Investor Warning (27) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Letter (19) Apply Letter filter
- Decision (16) Apply Decision filter
- Compliance table (14) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (5) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (2) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/05/2005 | 05-274 | Feedback Statement- Market Abuse Directive, Level 3 – first set of guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 79.76 KB |
http://www.cesr-eu.org/data/document/05_274.pdf | |||
22/11/2007 | 07-693 | Report on Administrative Measures and Sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 3.44 MB |
||||
28/02/2008 | 08-099 | CESR Executive summary to the report on administrative measures and sanctions as well as the criminal sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 874.1 KB |
||||
07/07/2011 | 2011/194 | Report- Mapping of the Transparency Directive | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.15 MB |
Report - Mapping of the Transparency Directive | |||
18/01/2011 | 2011/26 | Summary Report on the mapping of contingency measures | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 93.63 KB |
||||
26/04/2012 | 2012/270 | Actual use of sanctioning powers under MAD | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.55 MB |
The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010. The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime. | |||
24/05/2012 | 2012/300 | Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 467.38 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published today “Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process“, a peer review report on the application of regulatory good practices by national supervisory authorities - competent authorities (CA) when approving investment prospectuses.The review was conducted using good practice criteria that ESMA developed on selected areas of the Prospectus Directive dealing with the approval process for investment prospectuses. The prospectuses provide investors with easy to understand and relevant information on investment products. Peer review reports on national regulators’ procedures contribute to ESMA’s objective of fostering supervisory convergence and achieving a level playing field between jurisdictions. | |||
22/06/2012 | 2012/382 | MiFID Q&A in the area of investor protection and intermediaries | MiFID - Investor Protection | Q&A | PDF 319.78 KB |
||||
06/07/2012 | 2012/387 | Final report Guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 444.15 KB |
||||
01/07/2013 | 2013/805 | Supervisory Practices under MAD- Peer review report and Good Practices | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.17 MB |
ESMA's peer review of the supervisory practices EEA national competent authorities (NCAs) covers how national authorities enforce the requirements of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD). The Directive deals with the prevention of the dissemination of misleading information, the breach of reporting obligations and market abuse. | |||
01/07/2013 | 2013/806 | Supervisory Practices under MAD- Mapping Report | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 315.44 KB |
ESMA's Mapping Report on Supervisory Practices under MAD sets out the situation in each Member State as regards their implementation of the various requirements of the Market Abuse Directive. | |||
23/09/2014 | 2014/1164 Annex | Annex to the Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA to the ECON hearing, 23 September 2014 | Corporate Information | Final Report | PDF 503.01 KB |
||||
11/12/2014 | 2014/1485 | MiFID – Conduct of Business, fair, clear and not misleading information | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 614.16 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review of how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise MiFID conduct of business rules on providing fair, clear and not misleading information to clients. The peer review focused on NCAs’ organisation, supervisory approaches, monitoring and complaints handling in relation to information and marketing communications under MiFID. The Report found that there was overall a high degree of compliance amongst NCAs with the good practices identified in these key areas. However, a variety of approaches were observed, leading to different intensity of supervision. A number of areas for improvement were identified. They include: • enhanced use of on-site inspections and thematic reviews; • a specific focus on conduct of business issues in firms’ risk assessments; and • greater efforts to detect failings by firms in a timely manner. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by NCAs in a self-assessment questionnaire and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. | |||
28/09/2015 | 2015/1455 CBA | Cost analysis for Final Report on MAR technical standards | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 2.59 MB |
||||
30/11/2015 | 2015/1783 | Final Report on complex debt instruments and structured deposits | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 409.89 KB |
||||
22/12/2015 | 2015/1861 | Final report- Guidelines on cross-selling practices | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 389.42 KB |
||||
17/12/2015 | 2015/1886 | Final report on guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence | MiFID - Investor Protection | Final Report | PDF 422.68 KB |
Reasons for publication 1. Article 25(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) states that Member States shall require investment firms to ensure and demonstrate to competent authorities on request that natural persons giving investment advice or providing information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on behalf of the investment firm possess the necessary knowledge and competence to fulfil their obligations under Article 24 and Article 25 . 2. The European Securities and Markets Authority is required by Article 25(9) of MiFID II to develop – by 3 January 2016 - guidelines specifying criteria for the assessment of knowledge and competence of investment firms’ personnel. The guidelines will come into effect on 3 January 2017. 3. In accordance with Article 16(2) of the ESMA Regulation, a consultation was launched on 23 April 2015. The Consultation Paper (CP) set out draft ESMA guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence of individuals in investment firms providing investment advice or information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on behalf of the investment firm. The consultation period closed on 10 July 2015. 4. ESMA received 80 responses. The answers received on the CP are available on ESMA’s website unless respondents requested otherwise. 5. As provided by Article 16 of the ESMA Regulation, ESMA also sought the advice of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group’s (SMSG). 6. This paper contains summaries of responses received and feedback statements provided by ESMA. ESMA recommends that this report should be read together with the CP published on 23 April 2015 to have a complete understanding of the rationale for the guidelines. The final guidelines presented in Annex VI take into account the comments and suggestions raised by respondents. Contents 7. Section II briefly summarises the feedback to the CP and the main responses from ESMA. 8. Section III contains the Annexes: Annex I provides the Summary of questions, Annex II contains the legislative mandate, Annex III reports the cost-benefit analysis, Annex IV reports the Opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group, Annex V details the feedback on the CP, Annex VI sets out the final text of the guidelines and Annex VII describes some illustrative examples of the application of certain aspects of the guidelines. Next Steps 9. The final guidelines in Annex VI will be translated into the official EU languages and published on the ESMA website. The publication of the translations will trigger a two-month period during which National Competent Authorities (NCAs) must notify ESMA whether they comply or intend to comply with the guidelines. |
|||
22/12/2015 | 2015/1905 | MAD Supervisory Practices peer review follow-up | Market Abuse, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 239.64 KB |
||||
25/02/2015 | 2015/494 | Best Execution under MiFID | MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 761.62 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain. | |||
18/03/2015 | 2015/592 | Automated Trading Guidelines- ESMA peer review among National Competent Authorities | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 930.33 KB |