ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
32
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X Prospectus X Trade Repositories X Securities Financing Transactions X Corporate Information X Brexit X Market Abuse X Short Selling X Post Trading X Technical Standards X CESR Document X Decision X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
17/12/2020 106/20/COL ESA Third Renewal Decision under Art. 28(1) SSR , , Decision PDF
973.25 KB
17/12/2020 ESMA70 -155-11608 Decision renewal art. 28 SSR reporting threshold- December 2020 , , Decision PDF
246.27 KB
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv
17/09/2020 ESMA70-155-11072 ESMA Decision- renewal Article 28 SSR reporting threshold- September 2020 , , Decision PDF
396.47 KB
15/07/2020 ESMA70-155-10189 ESMA decision renewal of 10 June 2020 to lower the reporting thresholds of net short positions under Art.28 of the SSR Decision PDF
357.77 KB
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv
11/06/2020 ESMA70-155-10189 ESMA Decision- renewal Article 28 SSR reporting threshold , , Decision PDF
333.33 KB
26/03/2020 ESMA70-155-9546 ESMA Decision Article 28 SSR_reporting threshold , Decision PDF
236.57 KB
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv
23/03/2020 ESMA22-328-275 Decision of the Management Board- Rules of Procedure , Decision PDF
144.92 KB
16/03/2020 ESMA70-155-9546 ESMA decision on thresholds for reporting net short positions , , Decision PDF
236.65 KB
31/01/2019 ESMA35-43-1562 CFD Renewal Decision (2) Notice Decision PDF
103.92 KB
encsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplplptroskslsv
21/12/2018 ESMA35-43-1533 ESMA35-43-1533 Binary Options Renewal Decision Notice Decision PDF
83.04 KB
enenenenfrenelenethrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv
31/10/2018 ESMA35-43-1397 CFD Renewal Decision Notice Decision PDF
101.55 KB
enenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenen
31/03/2016 2016/408 Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR Decision PDF
62.47 KB

Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories

Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR

DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU.

In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’).

Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an  infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates.

02/10/2015 2015/1481 Final Report Draft technical standards on the Clearing Obligation – Index Credit Derivatives Technical Standards PDF
781.24 KB
28/09/2015 2015/1457 Annex III Annex III- CSDR TS on CSD Requirements and Internalised Settlement Technical Standards PDF
910.14 KB
28/09/2015 2015/1457 - Annex II Annex II- CSDR TS on CSD Requirements and Internalised Settlement Technical Standards PDF
1.44 MB
28/09/2015 2015/1457 Final Report CSDR TS on CSD Requirements and Internalised Settlement Technical Standards PDF
467.07 KB
28/09/2015 2015-ESMA-1455 Final Report MAR TS Technical Standards PDF
1.77 MB
30/06/2015 2015/1006 Final Report on MiFID II-MiFIR draft technical standards on authorisation, passporting, registration of third country firms and cooperation between competent authorities Technical Standards PDF
357.16 KB
01/10/2014 2014/1184 Final report on ESMA's draft technical standards on the Clearing Obligation for Interest Rate OTC Derivatives Technical Standards PDF
1.17 MB
20/12/2013 2013/1970 Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus , Technical Standards PDF
713.74 KB
The Final Report contains the draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) on situations which require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus which ESMA is required to submit to the European Commission by 1 January 2014 in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The Report furthermore includes a summary of the main responses received to ESMA’s Consultation Paper which was published in March 2013. The draft RTS sets out nine situations which are always considered to be significant in the context of securities issuance and where a supplement to the prospectus will always be required. Other situations would require a case-by-case assessment.