ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
23
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Sustainable finance X Joint Committee X Board of Supervisors X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Securities Financing Transactions X Annual Report X Decision X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
06/11/2020 ESMA70-155-11210 Delegation third country TV post trade transparency , Decision PDF
124.97 KB
09/10/2020 ESMA70-156-3300 MiFID II/MiFIR Annual Report under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/583 (RTS 2) Annual Report PDF
477.23 KB
15/06/2020 ESMA20-95-1264 2019 Annual Report , , , Annual Report PDF
3.03 MB
15/06/2020 ESMA20-95-1132 2020 Annual Work Programme- revised , , , Annual Report PDF
548.42 KB
20/03/2020 ESMA70-155-3832 List of trading venues benefiting from a transitional exemption from the access provisions under Article 36(5) of MiFIR Decision PDF
88.62 KB
09/03/2020 ESMA80-199-332 ESMA Supervision- Annual Report 2019 and Work Programme 2020 , , , , Annual Report PDF
825.72 KB
11/02/2020 ESMA22-328-356 Decision of the Board of Supervisors- Election of Management Board Members , Decision PDF
116.69 KB
17/10/2019 ESMA74-362-111 Decision on delegation to the Chair the adoption of changes to technical instructions on IT and data matters Decision PDF
127.62 KB
09/10/2019 ESMA70-156-1010 On the application of waivers and deferrals Annual Report PDF
7.3 MB
09/04/2019 2019 19 Joint Committee Annual Report 2018 Annual Report PDF
198.17 KB
11/10/2018 ESMA70-155-5905 Delegation_from_the_BoardofSupervisors_opinions on third country TV_PositionLimits , Decision PDF
222.28 KB
11/10/2018 ESMA70-155-5775 Delegation third country TV post trade transparency , Decision PDF
219.76 KB
19/06/2018 ESMA20-95-916 Annual Report 2017 , , Annual Report PDF
10.77 MB
30/04/2018 BoA 2018-01 Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA , Decision PDF
392.62 KB
14/06/2017 ESMA20-95-590 Annual Report 2016 , , Annual Report PDF
2.94 MB

Corrigendum - date on the letter of assurance from the Executive Director on p81 had inadvertently been dated 14 June 2017, when the letter was signed on 2 June 2017. The date has been amended accordingly

01/06/2017 ESMA41-137-1005 Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt a supervisory measure and impose fines with respect to infringements by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH and Moody’s Investors Service Limited , Decision PDF
207.16 KB
14/08/2015 BOA/2015/001 Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) , Decision PDF
147.78 KB
02/12/2014 2014/BOA/05 Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl , Decision PDF
229.85 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg.  The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint.
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
368.94 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA , Decision PDF
361.96 KB
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.